|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
施泰因论“个体”的现象学构造 = On Edith Stein’s Phenomenological Construction of the Individual / YU Xin.
// 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University No. 2, 2015 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015.129-137+160 pages. The phenomenological construction of"the individual"is one of the most important subjects in Edith Stein’s early phenomenology of empathy. The phenomenological construction of the individual refers to the clarification of "the individual in general"in its phenomenological sense,or "the individual self in general"in the phenomenologically intentional relevance. The individual( foreign individual and local individual) as the psychic-physical unity phenomenologically constructs itself in the act of "empathy"in a broader sense. And,the construction of the individuals refers to the inter-subjectively phenomenological construction of the real external world in the end.
|
|
2
|
索绪尔语言学理论的继承与批判. /c王铭玉, 于鑫.
// Foreign language teaching and research. 2013, Vol. 45, No.3.
// 外语教学与研究 2013, 第45卷.第3期 2013.tr. 353-373. The past century (1913-2013) has witnessed the development of modem linguistics with research focus on the inheritance and criticism of Saussure’s theories. The basic linguistic concepts developed by Saussure and his insights into the nature of linguistics exerted seminal influence on modern linguistics and proved to be a major theoretical origin of structuralism. However, the development of linguistics in its due course has given rise to doubts about Saussure’s theories which include, among others, the "homogenized” research methodology, the view of linguistic signs, the structuralist approach to linguistics, the relation between language and word formation as well as the object and methodology in the study of grammar. The present research reveals that Saussure’s profound insights and integrated theoretical systems still hold great significance while his major claims and methodology call for further exploration. Challenges against Saussure are, meanwhile, of positive importance in that they have ushered linguistics research in an era of multi- dimensional pluralism.
|
|
|
|
|