Dòng Nội dung
1
“吃食堂”的认知功能分析 = A Cognitive-functional Analysis of Mandarin Construction Chi Shitang / 胡勇; Hu Yong; // Chinese teaching in the world. shijie hanyu jioxue . 2016, No.3.
哈尔滨师范大学国际教育学院 上海师范大学对外汉语学院
342-355 p

Speculative and commentary adverbs co-occur in propositions.Their distribution mode and the specific usage fall into four categories:pre-sentence independent use vs.inner-sentence use attached to the adverbial,being attached to the whole sentence vs.being attached to the predicate,continuous co-occurrence vs.discontinuous co-occurrence,and being attached to main clause predicate vs.to sub-clause predicate.The expressive and semantic functions of dual commentary can be subsumed underexpressive commentary vs.cohesive commentary,full scope vs.half scope,assured speculation vs.speculation assurance,and recognition-type confirmation vs.suspicion-type confirmation.This compatibility of expression and the effect thus achieved are motivated by euphemistic subjective expression,comprehensive objective evaluation estimation,subjective judgment with leeway,and corresponding balance between different views.
2
现代汉语否定性无定代词“没的” / 沈阳, 史红改. // 当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics. No.2/2018.
2018.
p. 179-194.

This paper investigates the Chinese construction of"meide V"illustrated as in( 1). Focusing on the properties of meide,we find that it is distinguished from the verbal meide and the adverbial meide,and should be analyzed into a negative indefinite pronoun.( 1) a. zhe haizi zhenshi meide jiu le this kid truly MEIDE save PRT‘this kid truly has no chance to be saved’b. zhexia dajia dou meide xiuxi le this.time everybody all MEIDE rest PRT‘now we all have no chance to take a rest’The development pat... More
3
语法化视角下“着”和“在”的差异性分析 = The Analysis of Differences Between Zhe and Zai from the Perspective of Grammaticalization / 鞠志勤；Ju Zhiqin. // Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2015, No. 3 (173) // 语言教学与研究 2015, 第3卷 (173)

75-83 p.

"着"和"在"均是从表示方位关系的动词语法化为持续视点体标记的,但两者的语法化过程存在程度和路径两方面的差别。语法化程度的差别表现在:语义层面,"在"比"着"保留更多的动词属性和对情状界限的要求,从而影响它们的情状结合能力;词汇语法层面,"着"比"在"对动词的黏着程度更高,从而影响它们的句法辖域,以及与句法格式的兼容性。另外"着"和"在"不同的语法化路径使得两者对信息结构的要求不同,"着"背景化所附着的动词,"在"则将其后的谓语形式前景化。