|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
“吃食堂”的认知功能分析 = A Cognitive-functional Analysis of Mandarin Construction Chi Shitang / 胡勇; Hu Yong;
// Chinese teaching in the world. shijie hanyu jioxue . 2016, No.3. 哈尔滨师范大学国际教育学院 上海师范大学对外汉语学院342-355 p Speculative and commentary adverbs co-occur in propositions.Their distribution mode and the specific usage fall into four categories:pre-sentence independent use vs.inner-sentence use attached to the adverbial,being attached to the whole sentence vs.being attached to the predicate,continuous co-occurrence vs.discontinuous co-occurrence,and being attached to main clause predicate vs.to sub-clause predicate.The expressive and semantic functions of dual commentary can be subsumed underexpressive commentary vs.cohesive commentary,full scope vs.half scope,assured speculation vs.speculation assurance,and recognition-type confirmation vs.suspicion-type confirmation.This compatibility of expression and the effect thus achieved are motivated by euphemistic subjective expression,comprehensive objective evaluation estimation,subjective judgment with leeway,and corresponding balance between different views.
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
离合词的句法本质再探——对袁毓林(2018)等质疑的回应 / 叶狂, 潘海华.
// 当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics. 2018/4 - Volume 20 2018.p. 605-615. Yuan(2018) as well as others argues against Pan and Ye’s(2015) "cognate object hypothesis" which advocates that the constructions with separable words in Mandarin Chinese are bona fide cognate object constructions and no split inside disyllabic verbs has ever taken place. Yuan puts forward his own "metonymy hypothesis" for the separable words, claiming that the very mechanism that sanctions disyllabic words to be used in a divorced manner is formal metonymy, where a verb phrase with an incorpora.
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|