Dòng Nội dung
1
2
从北洋军阀史到北京政府时期的民国史 = A history of the Nationalist China : From Governance under the Northern Warlords to Beijing Government. / LUO Zhi-tian. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3. // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2014, 第一卷
2014
tr. 63-67.

Relative to the Qing Dynasty and historical research Nanjing National Government warm, historical research during the Beijing government is much deserted. For a long time, the revolution and warlords continue to rule these two clues collision is described as the main line of this history, "History of the Northern Warlords" became a generic term for this history. But such allegations, not only with the facts then differ, but also leads to all sorts of partial cover and limitations. In fact, the Beijing government period, just an important period for China s political, economic, cultural and social past and historical connotations complex and rich. It should break the limitations of the concept of the Northern Warlords, showing the history of Beijing during the whole process of government at all levels and as complete as possible and systematically, and traced Qing, dropping the national government and the history of New China, extending from the fact that outside contact, through vertical and horizontal, in order to be more nearly true and obtaining the clue, they are not to become Northern history Personalities, which could be dressed maidens.
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)
3
政治是在民国史研究中的位置 / 杨天宏 // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2013, Vol. 1 // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第一卷
南京: 南京大学学报编委会, 2013
tr. 113-119

政治史在传统历史撰述中曾居主导地位,但在西方新史学排斥政治史的取向影响下却滑至边缘。新史学拓展了历史研究领地,也带来了需要正视的"碎片化"问题。历史研究中的学科整合有多种选择,但就转型中的民国而言,由于政治在民元之后38年间已构成无处不见其身影的存在,套用"一切历史都是思想史"的极端表述法,似乎也可以用"全部民国史都是政治史"来强调民国政治史研究的重要性。加上与其他历史部类的内在关联,政治史尤其是民初15年的政治史可望作为整合已呈"碎片化"趋势的民国历史研究、使之形成一个有机整体的学术进路。但政治史学者也不应坐享前人的恩惠,不思进取。前些年国外政治史在多学科交叉的基础上翻"新",并对政治史的本色保持必要的学科认同,由此形成的"新政治史"取径,或许预示了民国政治史研究的希望。
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)
4
民国北洋史研究的新视野——“第二届中华民国史高峰论坛”综述 = A New Approach to the Historical Studies of Beiyang Government : A Literature Review of the Second Summit Forum on the History of the Nationalist China. / HU Yong-heng. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3. // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2014, 第一卷
2014
tr. 70-80.

Northern Research has long history is the history of the Republic of China as well as the study of popular modern history, has been heating up in recent years, it is necessary to conduct periodic inventory. The forum focused on the Northern history, not only the integrity of its reflection, but also from the historical heritage of the Northern period, different angles and power politics, foreign relations, economy and society, public media, ideology and culture were discussed. Scholars sought to uphold academic objective and neutral stance, there has long been put aside prejudice and dogma to come close to the true understanding of history. Scholars have also committed to find the weak links in both research and partial disadvantages of the Department, to explore new perspectives Northern history research, new methods and principles, in order to open a new situation in Northern History. Conference presents academic depth and height, resulting in a collision and contention academic point of view, showing the great potential of the history and charm of the Northern Research, research in this area will help to enrich and deepen further.
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)
5
民国史研究的新史料与新叙事——第三届“民国史研究高峰论坛”评述 / 张静. // Journal of Nanjing university 2016, Vol 53, N.3

p123-p128

近年来,"新史料"的出现以及爆发式增长已成为民国史学界共同关注的焦点,不管对其价值作何判断,"新史料"和由此引发的"新叙事"已经并还将继续给民国史研究带来深刻的影响和变化,这已毋庸置疑。学界应如何看待和应对这一变化?中国社会科学院近代史研究所于2015年11月主办的第三届"民国史研究高峰论坛"即以"民国史研究的新史料与新叙事"为主题,展开了深入的讨论,与会学者围绕"研究现状与未来取向""新史料对未来研究的影响""历史叙事的传承与求新""民国的嬗变与承继"等核心问题陈述的一系列观点颇具启发性
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)