Dòng Nội dung
1
不新的“新文化”:民国思潮第一幕的嵌入式研究 = A New Culture without Any Novelty: An Embedded Study on the Earliest Social Thoughts in Colonial-era China / 雷颐, LEI Yi. // Journal of Nanjing University . 2016, No.3.
中国社会科学院近代史研究所
89-100+159p

"Toppling down Chinese tradition in an uncompromising way"has long been viewed as either an unprecedented achievement or an incomparable guilt in May-4th New Culture Movement. However,a closer look at history can enable us to conclude that "toppling down Chinese tradition in an uncompromising way"may be traced back to as early as the A-Hundred-Day Reform Movement,and took its shape around the Revolution of 1911. May-4th New Culture Movement has been acclaimed as the matrix of the following five arguments: China had for thousands of years a dark history of autocratic rule by the emperors; the national character with servility of the Chinese people was necessarily to be transformed; personal emancipation should be upheld; Confucianism must be completely devalued; and the Chinese people should be enlightened with democracy and science. As a matter of fact,these arguments were thoroughly worked on in the period between the A-Hundred-Day Reform Movement and the Revolution of 1911. As the earliest social thoughts in colonial-era China,May-4th New Culture Movement contributed nothing but to broaden the arguments,and incorporated them into a social movement. Only by embedding these social thoughts into social movements can we better understand their matrix and significance.
2
保险请求权代位制度的新展开 = The New Extension of Insurance Subrogation Regime / 岳卫(YUE Wei). // Journal of Nanjing university 2016, Vol 53, N.3

p62-p69+p158-p159

The insurance subrogation regime rests,jurisprudently,on the principle of unjust enrichment in non-life insurance. But,the mandatory nature of such a principle has been under attack in recent years. According to the negative doctrine,contracting parties may agree that the claimed right shall not be subrogated in indemnity insurance contract,and the contract without such an agreement cannot be interpreted as allowing the insurer to subrogate the claimed rights of the in-sured. As the justification of the unjust enrichment principle rests on the policy consideration of prohibiting moral hazards,rather than a widely applicable general theory,the unjust enrichment principle should not be interpreted as a mandatory norm. The emergence of the fixed-amount-payment insurance is an embodiment of such a doctrine. Besides,as to the corresponding principle of legal effects in subrogation regime, the transferable right and its content, the sole consideration in the old regime,is a prerequisite one among other conditions in the new regime,which means the interest of the insured has the priority when conflicts of rights occur between the insurer and the insured
3
保险请求权代位制度的新展开 = The New Extension of Insurance Subrogation Regime / 岳卫, YUE Wei, 叶胥, YE Xu // Journal of Nanjing University . 2016, No.3.
南京大学法学院
62-69+158-159p

保险请求权代位制度的法理基础在于财产保险中的"利得禁止原则",然而近年来该原则的强行法规性受到质疑,并影响到相关具体规定的解释。认为请求权代位不应为强行法规的观点主张损失填补型保险合同中可以约定对相关权利不进行代位,没有约定的,保险人当然代位之解释亦不成立。其法理基础在于"利得禁止原则"为道德风险防范之政策性原则而非基于可普遍化的一般原理,定额给付型损失补偿保险的出现则可视为该理论发展的结果。此外,对于该制度的法律效果之一的"对应原则"的理解,也从以往单一的可移转权利内容之确定,发展为第三人给付内容分配时必须考量的原则,使得被保险人与保险人的权利发生竞合时优先被保险人的前提内容更为明确。
4
保险请求权代位制度的新展开 = The New Extension of Insurance Subrogation Regime / 岳卫, YUE Wei. // Journal of Nanjing University . 2016, No.3.
南京大学法学院
62-69+158-159p

保险请求权代位制度的法理基础在于财产保险中的"利得禁止原则",然而近年来该原则的强行法规性受到质疑,并影响到相关具体规定的解释。认为请求权代位不应为强行法规的观点主张损失填补型保险合同中可以约定对相关权利不进行代位,没有约定的,保险人当然代位之解释亦不成立。其法理基础在于"利得禁止原则"为道德风险防范之政策性原则而非基于可普遍化的一般原理,定额给付型损失补偿保险的出现则可视为该理论发展的结果。此外,对于该制度的法律效果之一的"对应原则"的理解,也从以往单一的可移转权利内容之确定,发展为第三人给付内容分配时必须考量的原则,使得被保险人与保险人的权利发生竞合时优先被保险人的前提内容更为明确。