|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
责任保险的内在逻辑及对食品安全风险之控制 = The Internal Logic of Liability Insurance and the Risk Control of Food Safety / 李华(LI Hua).
// Journal of Nanjing university 2016, Vol 53, N.3 p70-p77+p159 It is its responsibility for the society of risks to provide perfect insurance protection and strong risk control,so that social security is to be guaranteed,and people’s pursuit of equality and happiness,satisfied. The liability insurance is functional in transferring risks,spreading loss,compensating damage and providing relief. The transfer of liability risk may diminish the function of punishing and curbing the illegal in tort law,thus leaving the field of food safety at hazard morally. In China,it is not enough to put food safety simply under an authoritarian supervision.Food safety calls for a "cooperative management",where the insurer,feasibly and necessarily,should have a role to play. A perfect insurance system can not only help keep food safety from any incidence of moral hazards,but also is highly functional in risk management. The cooperation between an insurer and a food safety supervisor can help the former to improve its risk management of food safety,to have a multi-governance in food-safety risk curb,to perfect the management system of food safety,and to achieve the ultimate goal of keeping food safe
|
|
2
|
试论我国食品安全执法机制的变革 / 高志宏.
// Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and social sciences 2013, Vol. 6
// 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第四集 南京 : 南京大学学报编委会, 2013tr. 74 - 86. 随着我国市场经济法律体系的形成,食品安全方面的立法日臻完善.然而,我国食品安全执法机制却相对落后,集中表现在监管模式、执法理念、执法标准、执法保障、执法责任等方面存在较多问题,已成为我国食品安全事件频发的主要原因之一.我国已成立国家食品药品监督管理总局,整合食品安全监管职能.在食品安全执法中,监管部门要处理好高度独立、坚守职责、联合执法、公众参与、多元监督之间的关系,实现从运动执法、被动执法到常态执法、主动执法的转变,推进严刑峻法,强化信息公开和监管问责,走出食品安全监管的困境.
|
|
3
|
责任保险的内在逻辑及对食品安全风险之控制 = The Internal Logic of Liability Insurance and the Risk Control of Food Safety / 李华, LI Hua.
// Journal of Nanjing University . 2016, No.3. 南京大学法学院 70-77+159p 风险社会以提供完善的保险保障和强有力的风险控制为己任,以保障社会安全,满足人们追求平等与幸福为终极目标。责任保险具有转移风险、分担损失、损害填补之功能,同时为受害人提供及时的救助。责任风险的转移减弱了侵权法的惩罚与抑制违法功能,有可能诱发食品安全领域的道德危险。在我国,以威权管制为主导的食品安全监管尚存不足,食品安全治理应实现从"监管中心主义"向"合作治理理念"的转变,保险人参与食品安全治理具有可行性和必要性。完善的食品安全责任保险制度不仅可以防范食品安全的道德危险发生,而且还具有风险管理功能。通过保险人与食品安全监管者协作,发挥保险人风险管理的优势,形成食品安全风险的多元治理,创新食品安全治理机制,实现食品安全的目标。
|
|
4
|
食品安全私人执法研究——以惩罚性赔偿型消费公益诉讼为中心 = Study on Private Enforcement of Food Safety / 黄忠顺.
// Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences) Vol 68, No.4 (2015). 湖北省武汉市 : 双月, 201584-92 p. Public enforcement system has been strengthened in the new"Food Safety Law",while private enforcement system has not yet attracted the attention of legislators.As private enforcement performs indispensable and complementary functions,we should strengthen the system construction of the consumer public interest litigation through judicial interpretation.Consumer public interest litigation for punitive damages makes operators’ external costs and consumers’ positive externality internalized and reduces the incentive cost of private enforcement.In order to have the scale effect of punitive damages litigation realized,consumers might transfer both compensatory and punitive claims to some consumers’ association with qualification to file public interest litigation.
|
|
5
|
食品安全问题的诉讼求解与模式创新——以公益诉讼的视角展开 / 李响.
// Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and social sciences 2013, Vol. 6
// 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第四集 南京 : 南京大学学报编委会, 2013tr. 64 - 73. 近年来,尽管政府对食品安全采取了广泛且严厉的监管措施,但却未能从根本上消除不安全食品对老百姓人身安全的威胁,相关责任事故仍然层出不穷.越来越多的人开始意识到单靠政府的行政监管一条腿走路并不能形成有效规制,而让社会公众通过民事诉讼的方式参与食品安全治理,既是国际通行的惯例,对中国的现实情况也大有裨益.修改后的《民事诉讼法》虽然增加了食品安全公益诉讼的全新条款,但其中缺失的流程、沉默的主体、模糊的范围等因素,给该条款能否实现蒙上了阴影.为了保证公众的期望不致落空,有关于食品安全公益诉讼实施的一些关键性细节问题,必须得到认真探讨与合理规定.
|
|
|
|
|