|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
哈贝马斯的正义观与当代价值——兼论哈贝马斯与罗尔斯正义观的主要异同 / 冯颜利, 张朋光.
// Journal of Central China Normal University. Philosophy and social sciences. 2013, Vol. 52.
// 华中师范大学学报. 哲学社会科学版 2013, 第52卷 武汉 : 华中师范大学学报编辑部, 2013.tr. 75 - 85. 哈贝马斯是当代著名思想家,他在与罗尔斯的辩争中发展和完善了自己的正义思想。与罗尔斯以"原初状态"为前提、以政治正义为本质、以自由平等为核心的正义理论不同,哈贝马斯立足于理想的市民社会和生活世界之背景,以社会交往和主体间性学说为理论基础,提出和论证了以"理想语境"为前提、以程序正义为本质、以"合法性"为核心内容的正义学说,期冀通过人们之间的理性商谈这种合理程序来促进社会公平正义的实现。鉴于我国社会目前亟需解决的社会不公问题,对哈贝马斯正义理论的研究可为我国政治、法律和社会制度建设以及整个中国特色社会主义建设事业提供重要启示和借鉴。
|
|
3
|
实践理性、公共理由与正义观念的辩护 = Practical Reason,Public Reasons and Justification for Justice / CHEN Xiao-sheng.
// 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University No. 3, 2015 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015.129-141+159-160 pages. Influenced by Kant’s concept of practical reason,both Rawls and Habermas try to develop,through social contract procedure or ideal speech situation,Kant’s categorical imperative procedure,which is regarded as the demand of the practical reason itself,so as to establish a normative framework for regulating the public use of reason. However,they have different opinions on how to set up this framework. Habermas believes that a normative consensus should be formed on the bases of the same public reasons and under the ideal debilitative conditions;whereas Rawls argues that,in the justification of justice,the original deliberation of a "monologue"kind does not necessarily prevent the expression of the impartial moral point of view.What the citizens have achieved as a consensus,with yet incongruous concerns,is actually their requirement for a kind of public justification of complete and unified practical reason,under the condition of reasonable pluralism.
|
|
4
|
政治自由主义:一个完整的慎议政治的故事 = Political Liberalism: An Integrated Story of Deliberative Politics / TAN An-kui.
// 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University No. 3, 2015 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015.120-128+159 pages. According to a lasting criticism,the substantive consensus on justice that John Rawls never gave up seeking after actually weakens the vitality of democratic politics,and this is due not only to the way of choosing the principles of justice from the very beginning,but also to the constraint of public reason in a well-ordered society. But an analysis on the idea of overlapping consensus reveals that the object of the supposed consensus is nothing but public reason,or rather a norm of reasoning,which helps to bring into being a deliberative politics on theoretical stages of both the original position and the well-ordered society. Hence,political liberalism is a united theory of deliberative politics,and this theory extends the mode of deliberative politics beyond the narrow public sphere,so that we can interpret the being of the basic institutional structure with the idea of deliberative democracy.
|
|
|
|
|