Dòng Nội dung
1
我国公益诉讼原告制度的现实考察与应然变革=A Survey of China’s Public-interest Litigation Plaintiff System:Its Reality and Reform / 高志宏. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2016, Vol. 53, No. 2.
2016.
73-80+159 p.

There is much absurdity in China’s preliminary public-interest litigation system.As far as plaintiff qualification is concerned,consideration must be shown for its authoritativeness and representativeness,and efficiency of the system.China should learn from international practices,and expand the body of the public interest litigation plaintiff,so that public prosecutors,social organizations and citizens are entitled to have public-interest litigation.However,to avoid any abuse of public-interest litigation,it is public prosecutors and social organizations,rather than individuals that should be given the fast priority in acquiring public-interest litigation plaintiff qualification.Laws should be amended and judicial interpretations should be made,so that further improvement can be made in the public-interest litigation plaintiff system.
2
食品安全问题的诉讼求解与模式创新——以公益诉讼的视角展开 / 李响. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and social sciences 2013, Vol. 6 // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第四集
南京 : 南京大学学报编委会, 2013
tr. 64 - 73.

近年来,尽管政府对食品安全采取了广泛且严厉的监管措施,但却未能从根本上消除不安全食品对老百姓人身安全的威胁,相关责任事故仍然层出不穷.越来越多的人开始意识到单靠政府的行政监管一条腿走路并不能形成有效规制,而让社会公众通过民事诉讼的方式参与食品安全治理,既是国际通行的惯例,对中国的现实情况也大有裨益.修改后的《民事诉讼法》虽然增加了食品安全公益诉讼的全新条款,但其中缺失的流程、沉默的主体、模糊的范围等因素,给该条款能否实现蒙上了阴影.为了保证公众的期望不致落空,有关于食品安全公益诉讼实施的一些关键性细节问题,必须得到认真探讨与合理规定.