Dòng Nội dung
1
关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 / 周庆智. // Wuhan Universiy Journal. 2015, Vol. 68.N3 // 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.

20-30 pages.

Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
2
关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy / 周庆智. // Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Sciences) Vol 68, No.3 (2015).
湖北省武汉市 : 双月, 2015
20-30 p.

Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
3
关于“村官腐败”的制度分析——一个社会自治问题 = Institutional Analysis of “The Village Official Corruption”——A Question of Social Autonomy / 周庆智. // Wuhan Universiy Journal. 2015, Vol. 68. // 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.

20-30 p.

Is the corruption of village cadre a social problem,or institutional one?The discussion of the corruption of village official actually confused an essential issue:village official is not really official at all,who is a member of autonomous community of the society,at least in law.In another words,his corruption is resulted from that he is at juncture of two systems,which is state administrative one and society autonomous one.In addition,the genesis of his corruption is the paradox of the governing logic of present institution,and the disorder of the normal relationship between state power and society right.The corruption of village official signifies the power conflict of‘official governing’and social autonomy,the former is based on state power and the latter society one.The key to clamp down the corruption of village official is to differentiate administrative power and autonomous right,fixing the principle of society autonomy by rule of law.
4
村官刑法身份困惑的社会学思考 / 徐宏. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and social sciences 2013, Vol. 6 // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第四集
南京 : 南京大学学报编委会, 2013
tr. 87 - 94.

随着我国市场经济法律体系的形成,食品安全方面的立法日臻完善.然而,我国食品安全执法机制却相对落后,集中表现在监管模式、执法理念、执法标准、执法保障、执法责任等方面存在较多问题,已成为我国食品安全事件频发的主要原因之一.我国已成立国家食品药品监督管理总局,整合食品安全监管职能.在食品安全执法中,监管部门要处理好高度独立、坚守职责、联合执法、公众参与、多元监督之间的关系,实现从运动执法、被动执法到常态执法、主动执法的转变,推进严刑峻法,强化信息公开和监管问责,走出食品安全监管的困境.
5
论“小官贪腐”问题的体制与机制根源——以乡村治理制度为中心 / 周庆智. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2015, Vol. 52, No. 5.
2015.
128-136 p.

"小官"是指从事基层行政运作的乡镇基层干部以及基层群众自治组织中的村干部,他们是基层治理的参与者和执行者,或多或少掌握着资源的分配权和使用权。"小官贪腐"发生在政府与社会之间的资源配置和使用领域,乡镇基层干部包括村干部的职权行为处在国家权力与社会权利的交汇场所。"小官贪腐"反映的是乡村治理制度的异化,即乡镇政府部门在功能、结构乃至运行机制上与正式制度之间产生偏离,也表现为乡镇政府与基层社会之间关系上的异化。解决"小官贪腐",根本在于确立基层权威的社会授权来源,进一步完善社会治理,从而使国家权力的行使和社会权利的保障建立在法治原则和制度化的基础上。