|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
CSL学习者单音量度形容词混淆的错杂性与不平衡性 = Complexity and Imbalance of Confusion on the Monosyllabic Quantitative Adjective Words by CSL Learners. / 苏向丽.
// Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2015, No. 1 (171)
// 语言教学与研究 2015, 第1卷 (171) 22-30 p. Based on the large-scale interlanguage corpus of CSL learners,the study of this paper investigated the 80 pairs of confusable words that are the mixed use of 36 monosyllabic quantitative adjective words.Obvious complexity and imbalance on these words are found and demonstrated.The complexity of it can be illustrated as follows:the mixed uses of these words are mainly"many-to-many",and"bidirectional misuse"is dominating.The types of semantic relationship on the confusable words were diverse,and their proto-meanings and non-proto-meanings were mutually misused.The imbalance was mainly reflected in that the distribution was unbalanced in the misusing frequency and number of confusable words,especially in that the positive quantitative adjective words were commonly confused more than that of negative quantitative adjective words.In addition,confusion among positive quantitative adjective words was more than that among negative ones and among the both.
|
|
3
|
Processing unambiguous verbal passives in German / Nino Grillo.
// Journal of Linguistics Vol. 55, Issue 3/2019 2019.p. 523-562 Passivization played a central role in shaping both linguistic theory and psycholinguistic approaches to sentence processing, language acquisition and impairment. We present the results of two experiments that simultaneously test online processing (self-paced reading) and offline comprehension (through comprehension questions) of passives in German while also manipulating the event structure of the predicates used. In contrast to English, German passives are unambiguously verbal, allowing for the study of passivization independent of a confound in the degree of interpretive ambiguity (verbal/adjectival). In English, this ambiguity interacts with event structure, with passives of stative predicates naturally receiving an adjectival interpretation. In a recent study, Paolazzi et al. (2015, 2016) showed that in contrast to the mainstream theoretical perspective, passive sentences are not inherently harder to process than actives. Complexity of passivization in English is tied to the aspectual class of the verbal predicate passivized: with eventive predicates, passives are read faster (as hinted at in previous literature) and generate no comprehension difficulties (in contrast to previous findings with mixed predicates). Complexity effects with passivization, in turn, are only found with stative predicates. The asymmetry is claimed to stem from the temporary adjectival/verbal ambiguity of stative passives in English. We predict that the observed difficulty with English stative passives disappears in German, given that in this language the passive construction under investigation is unambiguously verbal. The results support this prediction: both offline and online there was no difficulty with passivization, under either eventive or stative predicates. In fact, passives and their rich morphology eased parsing across both types of predicates.
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
论当代中国政治的复合性与国家治理现代化 / 刘伟.
// Wuhan Universiy Journal. 2015, Vol. 68.N3
// 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷. 31-39 pages. 讨论当代中国政治的学者和观察家们,往往在一定程度上忽视了发展至今的当代中国政治其内在的高度复杂性,而在观察层面和视角上各执己见,在事实分析和价值判断上众说纷纭。实际上,当代中国政治承接了古代帝国政治、近现代政治与改革后政治三大传统,并在精神、体系和运行三个层面均独特地复合了三大传统中的相应要素由此造成当代中国政治成为一个难以简单透视和定性的多面体。可以采取复合式的分析进路,深入当代中国政治的内在机理并予以总体把握,从而消解与其相关的意识形态之争,直面当代中国政治的复合性质和复合逻辑。更为关键的,当代中国政治的复合性所形成的张力结构,在政治空间和体制资源等方面从深层影响着国家治理现代化的前景。
|
|
|
|
|