|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
Cấu trúc danh từ tiếng Việt trong văn bản “Phật thuyết đại báo phụ mẫu ân trọng kinh”./ Vũ Đức Nghiệu
// Ngôn ngữ. 2014, Số 1 (296). 2014tr. 3-19. This paper deals with the structure of Vietnamese Noun Phrase (NP) appeared in the text “Phat thuyet dai bao phu mau an trong kinh” written around XII century. Following are some conclusions: (1) Structurally, NPs of the text “Phat thuyet…” and NPs of the modern Vietnamese are similar. Their differences are in words which may appear in the position of premodifiers. (2) In the position number 2 and position number 3 of NPs of “Phat thuyet…” word “hết, nhất thiết, bao nhiêu, những” express the meanings that are different from those of modern Vietnamese. Also, we found here the combinations that are different from those of modern Vietnamese: “bao nhiêu + chư [≈ các (all)]”; “tất + bao nhiêu + chư [≈ các (all)]”; “hết + mọi [≈ các (all)]”; “những + chúng [≈ các (all)]…
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
Les noms d idéalités et la modalité: marquage dune opposition. / Nelly Flaux, Dejan Stosic.
// Langages. 2014, Vol. 193. 2014p. 128-142. In this paper, we apply the category of modality to the class of nouns. Understood in its original sense, i.e. as an evaluation of objects in terms of true/false, beautiful/ugly or good/bad, modality is used here as one of a series of criteria for classifying a particular kind of nouns, which we call “ideality nouns” (IdN) following Husserl (e.g. sonata, poem, engraving, theorem). Such nouns refer to those objects that are endowed with a spiritual content supposed to be interpreted by humans. The three modal oppositions mentioned above, combined with other linguistic parameters, allow us both to well establish the distinction between IdNs denoting “free idealities” (e.g. theorem, number, triangle) and IdNs denoting “bound idealities” (e.g. symphony, novel, painting) and to refine the classification of the class itself.
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|