Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
1
|
Chính tả: chuẩn lý tưởng và chuẩn thực tế./ Nguyễn Đức Dân, Nguyễn Thùy Nương
// Ngôn ngữ. 2014, Số 5 (300). 2014tr. 3-10. There are two types of standard: the ideal and practice ones. Rules of ideal standard must be, on the first level, absolutely correct in every case or, on the second level, accepted by everyone. Rules of practical standard are correct in most cases with very few exceptions and accepted by most people. This paper proves that there is no ideal standard for orthography. No rules can be applied to the “chat” language. In the paper, the provided examples of rules in choosing “i” or “y”, writing proper names, and spelling loanwords will demonstrate the practical standard.
Đầu mục:0
(Lượt lưu thông:0)
Tài liệu số:0
(Lượt truy cập:0)
|
2
|
Orthographic bias in L3 lexical knowledge = Learner-related and lexical factors / Outi Veivo, Eija Suomela-Salmi and Juhani Järvikivi.
// LIA language, interaction and acquisition. 2015, Vol. 6, No. 2. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.270-293p ; 24 cm.In this paper, we examine some of the factors that might influence the accessing of meanings of written and spoken L3 words. We tested learners of L3 French who had Finnish as their L1 and were highly competent in L2 English. They were presented with L3 French words in written and spoken form, and were asked to give a possible translation for the target word in L1 and to rate their level of confidence in the meaning given. Because of their instructional learning background, we expected orthographic forms to be more familiar than phonological ones. This hypothesis was confirmed. The meanings of the L3 words presented were accessed more easily and more accurately in the orthographic than in the phonological modality, although this asymmetry decreased with a higher level of proficiency. The confidence ratings were negatively affected by a similarity to L2 words. General implications for L3 lexical knowledge are discussed.
Đầu mục:0
(Lượt lưu thông:0)
Tài liệu số:0
(Lượt truy cập:0)
|
|
|
|
|