Dòng Nội dung
1
“被发明的传统”——《人间词话》是如何成为国学经典的 = The Invention of Tradition: How Ren Jian Ci Hua Became the Canonic Chinese Classics?. / LUO Gang. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2014, Vol. 51, No. 3. // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2014, 第一卷
2014
81-90.

Ren Jian Ci Hua by Wang Guowei did not arouse any significant interest from the society of Ci-poetry in the late Qing Dynasty,nor did his theory of poetics bring forth any cultural influence around the period of Xinhai Revolution in 1911. Only after the May Fourth New Culture Movement did the book begin to gain a rising reputation through the praises from Hu Shi and others. In 1930’s- 1940’s,such scholars as Tang Guizhang wrote to critizise Wang’s theory of poetics. In 1950’s- 1960’s,the scholars,trained in Soviet Union literary tradition,made a great number of researches on Wang’s poetics,and this helped the book be canonized. Their critical interest is mainly in the correspondence between Ren Jian Ci Hua and the literary theories in Soviet Union tradition. They spoke highly of Wang’s theory on artistic conception,and regard it as the closest practice to western modern literary theories in ancient Chinese literary theories. Ren Jian Ci Hua became a magnum opus of ancient Chinese poetics through scholars’ further efforts in 1980’s- 1990’s,and the theory on artistic conception in ancient China put forward by Wang has been constantly constructed in the framework of western theories. Indeed,Wang’s theory on artistic conception is one of the instances of what Eric Hobsbawm defines as the invention of tradition. Once we take the theory of artistic conception,which was invented by Wang with his knowledge of classic German aesthetics as the central category and aesthetic ideal of ancient Chinese poetics,we are indeed digging a tomb up for the poetic tradition and aesthetic ideal of our nation.
2
章太炎:悲观主义与“进步”观念 = Zhang Taiyan: A Pessimist with “Progressive” Ideas / BAO Wen-xin. // 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University No. 2, 2015
新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015.
82-91+159 pages.

"悲观主义"范畴可以提供理解章太炎思想的新思路。严复的"天演论"使用"体用"框架来整合现代"进步"观念,遗留了意志论与决定论、特殊性与普遍性等诸多问题。悲观主义在这一理论背景下展开。捍卫自由意志与特殊性是悲观主义者的基本立场,这种拯救主体性的企图使他们在本质上局限于现代性的论域之内。在强调意志本体的同时,悲观主义者又试图接受实证主义的规范,从而导致了一种以虚静本体和非理性主义为主要特征的本体论断裂意识。在这一架构之上,章太炎的悲观主义提供了中国近代思想史上最为深刻和激烈的现代性批判,但它未能成就一套新的、具有建设性的现代性学说,而是在矛盾和妥协的两难中走向终结。