Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
1
|
指称关系和任意关系、差异关系——索绪尔语言符号观排除外在事物原因探究. /c屠友祥.
// Foreign language teaching and research. 2013, Vol. 45, No.3.
// 外语教学与研究 2013, 第45卷.第3期 2013.tr. 339-350. The reality Saussure mentioned is not what Benveniste understood as a thing in the objective world, but the linguistic fact in the consciousness of speakers, the psychological reality. Similarly, all the phonatory behaviors can become phonatory realities only when they appear in the acoustic image of speakers. Instead of investigating the reference relation between “word” and “thing”, Saussure focused on the arbitrary relation between “word” and “meaning” and the difference relation between "word” and “word”. The concept and the acoustic image are both the facts of pure consciousness, and can make up a totality, but such characteristics do not exist between the sound I image and the thing. The totality established by the relationship between the concept and the acoustic image is far more complete. The reality is the unity of a value, a unit, and an identity. The relation between the concept and the acoustic image is arbitrary. The arbitrary relation opens I up an infinite possibility for the linguistic sign. The difference relation between “word" and “word" has an unlimited potential for meaning and value, while the reference relation between “word” and “thing” ignores the relation between “word” and “word”, and therefore eludes the general law of signs. That explains why Saussure eliminated the thing and the objective reality from the linguistic semiology.
|
2
|
马克思:自在之物与事物自身之谜的破解——历史唯物主义的构境论阐释 = Marx--Solution to Enigma of Ding an Sich and Sache Selbst: A Situating Interpretation of Historical Materialism / ZHANG Yi-bing
// 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University No. 2, 2015 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015.5-16+158 pages. 在德国古典哲学中,德语中有细微差异的Ding(物)与Sache(事物)概念在康德与黑格尔的形而上学构境中发生了一种重要的意义突现,它们分别以Ding an sich(自在之物)与Sache selbst(事物自身)的方式颠覆了Ding与Sache的常识语境。这一形而上学思想经费尔巴哈的唯物主义颠倒,到了赫斯那里发展成货币异化论的逻辑基础:赫斯承袭了黑格尔的社会经济现象学批判逻辑,提出人的交往类本质颠倒成了经济事物的观点。青年马克思则超越了赫斯,提出劳动类本质异化的理论。马克思关于康德"自在之物"和黑格尔"事物自身"问题的最终解决实现于历史唯物主义的生成:在现代性生产的历史构境中,康德—黑格尔所指认的那个以一定的形式向我们呈现的物性现象界不是一个理性构架统摄的认知结果,而是由一定的社会实践塑形的历史存在本身,观念世界"向自然的立法"的统觉建构和自我意识感知逻辑只不过是历史性物质实践构形的观念偶像化。
|
|
|
|
|