|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
索绪尔语言学理论的继承与批判. /c王铭玉, 于鑫.
// Foreign language teaching and research. 2013, Vol. 45, No.3.
// 外语教学与研究 2013, 第45卷.第3期 2013.tr. 353-373. The past century (1913-2013) has witnessed the development of modem linguistics with research focus on the inheritance and criticism of Saussure’s theories. The basic linguistic concepts developed by Saussure and his insights into the nature of linguistics exerted seminal influence on modern linguistics and proved to be a major theoretical origin of structuralism. However, the development of linguistics in its due course has given rise to doubts about Saussure’s theories which include, among others, the "homogenized” research methodology, the view of linguistic signs, the structuralist approach to linguistics, the relation between language and word formation as well as the object and methodology in the study of grammar. The present research reveals that Saussure’s profound insights and integrated theoretical systems still hold great significance while his major claims and methodology call for further exploration. Challenges against Saussure are, meanwhile, of positive importance in that they have ushered linguistics research in an era of multi- dimensional pluralism.
|
|
2
|
马克思主义与中国的现代性启蒙话语 = Marxism and Chinese Modern Enlightenment Discourse. / ZHONG Bing.
// Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2014, Vol. 51, No. 5.
// 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2014, 第一卷 201413-18. "启蒙"作为一种现代性话语,其衍生与发展的基本语境源于西方社会。与西方的现代性进程相比,中国现代性的发生源于外部压力,呈现出非自主的性质。如何将西方的启蒙话语置于中国社会的土壤中,是近代以来中国思想界所要面对的问题。马克思主义不仅仅是现代性的产物,同时也是在现代性与资本主义高度发达的社会背景下对西方现代性进行反思与批判的产物,因而具有启蒙与批判的双重特质。对中国而言,马克思主义所具有的启蒙与现代性批判的双重内涵,可以为中国的现代性进程提供可靠的理论支撑。
|
|
|
|
|