|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
动词的目的义及其在词典释义中的处理 / 谭景春.
// 当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics. 2018/3-Volume 20 2018.p. 439-462. 本文讨论动词的目的义。动词的目的义可分为制作义、去除义、附着义、使移动、使发声、使变化、使锋利、使美观、自杀义、"表示"义和其他类十一种语义类型。有的动词含有两个或两个以上语义类型的目的义,因此存在着动词目的义的兼类。就动词的动作义和目的义而言,含有目的义的及物动词,有的只能带同一类名词做宾语,这是因为动作义和目的义所带的宾语相同;有的可以带两类不同的名词做宾语,这是因为动作义和目的义所带的宾语不同。认识到这一点对确定宾语的语义类型有一定的帮助。含有目的义的动词,其动作义的释义有五种处理方式:说明描写的释义方式、"用××的动作/方式/办法"的释义方式、"用+工具+同义动词"的释义方式、"用+工具"的释义方式、只释出目的义不释出动作义的释义方式。动词目的义的性质有四种:语境目的义、蕴含目的义、词汇目的义、规约目的义,其中词汇目的义、规约目的义在词典释义中往往是可以也需要解释出来的。文章最后列举了对"通、褪、涂"三个词的动作义的增补和对"休息、坐、拖、腌、撬"五个词的目的义的增补,说明《现代汉语词典》的释义在不断修订中更趋完善。
|
|
2
|
形容词带宾的韵律句法分析 = A Prosodic-Syntax Analysis on “Adj.+Object”Construction in Mandarin Chinese. / Jia Lin-Hua.
// 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) 2014, No.5. 2014.p. 51-58. On the basis of contemporary Prosodic-Syntax and Light-verb theory,we analyze two special phenomena of‘adj. + object’in mandarin Chinese: "single-syllable adj. + double objects"and"two-syllable adj. +object". We propose that( Ⅰ). The above two structures both result from the head-movement triggered by light verbs;( Ⅱ). the reasons why the indirect object of single-syllable adj. prefers to personal pronouns or relative appellation words and why the object of two-syllable adj.has to be two-syllable are both because of constraint of the Nuclear Stress Rule( NSR) of Chinese language. The above analysis not only offers new evidences to the theory of Prosodic Syntax,but also provides supports to the argument that syntactic movement has to observe the prosodic rule.
|
|
3
|
论单双音节动词带宾的句法差异及其语体特征 = On the Syntactic and Register Difference Between Monosyllabic and Disyllabic Verbs Carrying Objects / 骆健飞
// Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies no. 1 (2017). 14-24 p. This paper investigates the collocation issue between Chinese monosyllabic or disyllabic verbs and different types of objects,and discovers that(1)objects of manners and instrument tend to collocate with monosyllabic verbs;(2)in terms of the syntactic structure,objects collocating with monosyllabic verbs mostly rank low syntactically,while those with disyllabic verbs rank high;(3)in terms of the time and space feature,monosyllabic verbs usually has strong features of time and space,while disyllabic verbs are usually general and vague in this feature,without indicating the manners or instrument,thus unable to carry objects of manners or instrument.The paper proposes that the monosyllabic and disyllabic verbs’ collocational behaviors correspond with the style and function,the syntactic structure and the time and space feature of the objects
|
|
|
|
|