Dòng Nội dung
1
企业合并违法确认标准调整的中外比较 = On Standards for Affirming Illegality about Incorporation of Enterprises:Comparison between China and Foreign Countries. / Liu Yan. // Journal of Huazhong normal University. 2014, Vol. 53. // 华中师范大学学报.人文社会科学版 2014, 第53卷
武汉 : 华中师范大学学报编辑部, 2014.
37-49 p.

Antitrust laws,with standards for affirming illegality as its core content,are policy-related laws and regulations which aim to interfere in economy.Whether in America or in Germany and Japan,antitrust laws have experienced a dynamic adjusting process of loosening and strictness.The change of international political and economic situation decides the adjusting trend of the legislation and execution of antitrust laws.In America,Japan and Germany,the standards for affirming illegality about incorporation of enterprises have the characteristics of quantification and concreteness,whereas in China,the standards for affirming illegality are broad qualitative descriptions with the feature of flexibility.In order to promote the industrialization in China and ensure justice and operability in executing the laws,the adjusting trend of Chinese standards for affirming illegality should be the combination of both suitable qualitative nature and more quantification.
2
我国反垄断法适用于知识产权领域的再思考 / 王先林 // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social sciences 2013, Vol. 1 // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第一卷
南京: 南京大学学报编委会, 2013
tr. 34-43

我国《反垄断法》第55条有其特定的立法背景和意图,表明了该法在知识产权领域实施的基本原则和立场,但是它的功能是宣示性和说明性的,并不是认定特定知识产权行使行为是否构成垄断行为的直接依据。对"滥用知识产权"要从一般意义上去理解,而不能自觉或者不自觉地按照某些国家判例法上的特定含义去理解。滥用知识产权不一定构成垄断行为,但构成垄断行为的行使知识产权行为则一定是滥用知识产权。在制定我国知识产权领域的反垄断执法指南时,应处理好借鉴国外经验与立足我国当前实际的关系以及原则性与可操作性之间的关系。