|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
“王冕死了父亲”的构式归属——兼议汉语存现构式的范畴化/ 吕建军
// Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2013, Vol. 5 (163).
// 语言教学与研究 2013, 第5卷 (163) 北京 : 北京语言大学语言研究所, 2013.tr. 75-83 This paper argue that the construction meaning of "wang mian sile fugin" is "appearance or disapearance" rather than "occurrence" or "gaining or lossing" on the basis of inheritance relation of construction. The paper also claims that this type of sentence should be classified as existential sentences, according to the locative character which the animate noun in front of sentence showed by metonymy as well as the relationship between the verb and construction meaning. Finally, the category of existential sentences is summarized.
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
Đặc điểm về cấu tạo và ý nghĩa ngữ pháp của thành ngữ trái nghĩa trong tiếng Việt. / Trần Anh Tư.
// Ngôn ngữ và đời sống. 2014, Số 7 (225). 2014tr. 26-29. Antonym is a popular issue in real life and also a general significant matter of language. Antonym appears on different levels of languages but it is seen clearly and originally in the field of vocabulary, especially idioms. With the purpose of discovering and confirming the value of antonym idioms in terms of language, simultaneously providing the extra source for vocabulary teaching at school, Vietnamese antonym idioms are referred with original characteristics in terms of structure as well as general grammatical meaning. They always appear with a variety of antonym types and accidental expressive value. Especially, speakers can easily achieve their communication purpose and have a deep understanding on happening issues when they use pairs of antonym idioms with main-subordinate structure which contains both antonym of vocabulary and antonym of rhetoric.
|
|
5
|
Meaning, metaphor, and argument structure / Tim Nisbet
// Journal of Linguistics Volume 56 , Issue 3, 01 August 2020 United States : Cambridge University Press, 2020p. 629 - 662 This paper challenges what it calls the semantic determinist hypothesis (SDH) of argument licensing, according to which the syntactic realisation of a verb’s arguments is a function of its semantic properties. Specifically, it takes issue with ‘event schema’ versions of the SDH applied to the English ditransitive alternation (give/send {Jesse the gun/the gun to Jesse}), which claim a systematic, syntactically predictive distinction between ‘caused possession’ and ‘caused motion’. It is first shown that semantic and syntactic irregularities among the alternating verbs disconfirm such a mapping. More crucially, however, it is argued that ‘non-prototypical’ (metaphorical and idiomatic) usage (The news report gave Walt an idea, Walt’s actions gave the lie to his promises, The discovery sent Jesse into a fury) is fatal to the SDH, since the hypothesis entails the existence of semantic constraints on argument realisation which these expressions violate.
Based on an analysis of the semantically-related verbs give, send, and put, it is claimed that prototypical, metaphorical and idiomatic expressions of a verb can all be licensed straightforwardly, but only if theory maintains separate syntactic and semantic representation of arguments in lexical entries, observing the ‘parallel architecture’ of Jackendoff (1997, 2002), and only if argument tokens are licensed by the syntactic representation alone. A type of structure called a Lexical Argument Construction is proposed, which can describe all the relevant properties of verbs and verbal idioms.
|
|
|
|
|