Dòng Nội dung
1
Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards? / Annita Florou, Urska Kosi, Peter F. Pope. // Accounting and Business Research Volume 47, 2017 - Issue 1
2017.
p. 1-29.

We examine whether the credit relevance of financial statements, defined as the ability of accounting numbers to explain credit ratings, is higher after firms are required to report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We find an improvement in credit relevance for firms in 17 countries after mandatory IFRS reporting is introduced in 2005; this increase is higher than that reported for a matched sample of US firms. The increase in credit relevance is particularly pronounced for higher risk speculative-grade issuers, where accounting information is predicted to be more important; and for IFRS adopters with large first-time reconciliations, where the impact of IFRS is expected to be greater. These tests provide reassurance that the overall enhancement in estimated credit relevance is driven by accounting changes related to IFRS adoption. Our results suggest that credit rating analysts’ views of economic fundamentals are more closely aligned with IFRS numbers, and that analysts anticipate at least some of the effects of the IFRS transition.
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)
2
Are international accounting standards more credit relevant than domestic standards?/ Annita Florou, Urska Kosi, Peter F.Pope // Accounting and Business Research vol.3-2017
2017.
p. 1-29.

We examine whether the credit relevance of financial statements, defined as the ability of accounting numbers to explain credit ratings, is higher after firms are required to report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). We find an improvement in credit relevance for firms in 17 countries after mandatory IFRS reporting is introduced in 2005; this increase is higher than that reported for a matched sample of US firms. The increase in credit relevance is particularly pronounced for higher risk speculative-grade issuers, where accounting information is predicted to be more important; and for IFRS adopters with large first-time reconciliations, where the impact of IFRS is expected to be greater. These tests provide reassurance that the overall enhancement in estimated credit relevance is driven by accounting changes related to IFRS adoption. Our results suggest that credit rating analysts’ views of economic fundamentals are more closely aligned with IFRS numbers, and that analysts anticipate at least some of the effects of the IFRS transition.
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)
3
Benefits and challenges of IFRS application in Vietnam / Phạm Phương Linh; Đinh Lê Mai hướng dẫn.
Hà Nội : Đại học Hà Nội, 2020.
77tr. ; 30cm.


Đầu mục:2 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:1 (Lượt truy cập:2)

4
5
The determinants and valuation effects of classification choice on the statement of cash flows / Andreas Charitou, Irenne Karamanou, Anastasia Kopita. // Accounting and Business Research Vol.48, No.6
2018.
p. 613-650.

In this paper we exploit the choice allowed by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) regarding the presentation of interest payments on the cash flow statement to answer two related questions: First, whether the classification choice is explained by firm reporting incentives and second, whether it is value relevant. Using a UK sample, we find that firms reporting losses, with a greater proportion of their debt stemming from public sources, with CFO-based covenants and greater increases in leverage in the year of adoption are less likely to report interest payments in cash flows from operating activities (CFOA). Results also suggest that the incentive to meet or beat analyst CFO forecasts decreases, but strong corporate governance increases the probability of including interest payments in CFOA. Based on the assumption that the decision not to classify interest payments in CFOA captures lower disclosure quality or poor future expected performance, we posit that these firms should also exhibit lower valuations. Results obtained after correcting for self-selection bias confirm this assertion. We conclude that managers’ decision not to classify interest payments in CFOA is consistent with the opportunistic use of the choice allowed by IFRS.
Đầu mục:0 (Lượt lưu thông:0) Tài liệu số:0 (Lượt truy cập:0)