Dòng Nội dung
1
双音化在句法位置的分化作用——兼论汉语附着词前后转化的不对称 / 李思旭 // 汉语学习 No.2/2019

tr.16-28

本文探讨双音化在谓语核心动词前后的分化作用,解释动后附着成分与动前前置成分不能跟动词发生词汇化的动因。将汉语附着词的虚化跟人类语言普遍的语法化路径进行对比,指出汉语虚词语法化的类型学特征,并分析附着词前后转化的不对称性

2
双音化在句法位置的分化作用——兼论汉语附着词前后转化的不对称 / 李思旭 // 汉语学习 No.3/2019

tr.16-28

本文探讨双音化在谓语核心动词前后的分化作用,解释动后附着成分与动前前置成分不能跟动词发生词汇化的动因。将汉语附着词的虚化跟人类语言普遍的语法化路径进行对比,指出汉语虚词语法化的类型学特征,并分析附着词前后转化的不对称性
3
指示词的复杂度与指称意义、句法功能的关系——以汉语、韩语、日语为主要样例 = The Study of the Relationship between the Complexity of Demonstratives,Their References and Syntactic Functions. / Cui Jian. // 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) 2014, No.3.
2014.
p. 3-13.

This paper makes a comparison and contrast,by the data from Chinese,Korean and Japanese languages, between the complexity degree of the demonstratives, their references and the corresponding syntactic functions. In Chinese,the different syntactic and pragmatic features, introduced by different structural positions,are directly related to the alternative patterns of the demonstrative forms, while in Korean and Japanese languages, complex forms may occur in any subject or object position,since the demonstratives in the bare forms are not self-sufficient. However,it is not such a case in the attributive positions. These differences are mainly due to the variations of functional demonstratives,which are realized in terms of their different types and different functional loads.
4
汉语(交互)主观性表达的句法位置 = The Syntactic Position of Chinese(inter) Subjectivity/ 完权. // 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi)ning No.3/2017.
2017.
p. 3-12.

A cross-language hypothesis of the asymmetry between(inter)subjectivity and cla use periphery has been put forward based on English and French. After founding a principle of judging intersubjectivity, this work surveyed Chinese evidences pro and con, including th e syntactic and semantic factors of equivalents and some other typical position-sensitive wor ds. The fact is that the expressions of(inter) subjectivity do not depend on any particular po sition. Thus, an alternative hypothesis is proposed at the end.
5
论组合关系和聚合关系的不对称——兼论“聚合规则”作为术语的不合理性 = On the Asymmetry between Syntagmatic Relation and Paradigmatic Relation / 胡勇. // Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2015, No. 2 (172) // Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2015, No. 2 // 语言教学与研究 2015, 第2卷 (172) // 语言教学与研究 2015, 第2卷

102-110 p.

基于索绪尔的《普通语言学教程》,文章探讨了:(1)"聚合"就是"类别","聚合关系"的实质是同类关系,"组合关系"的实质是同现关系。(2)划分聚合的关键是明确分类标准,"可替换性"和"组合功能"只是众多标准中的两种。(3)"组合"是线性的,"聚合"是非线性的,"横组合关系"的说法多余,"纵聚合关系"的说法不成立。(4)"聚合规则"既无内涵,又无外延,是个伪概念。