|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
从事件框架看现代汉语中“在+处所”结构 / 梁子超, 金晓艳
// 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning 2020(04) 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020p.42-50 The main research on "Zai+ PLACE" structure lies in two different constructions—"Zai+PLACE+VP" and "VP+Zai+PLACE". These two constructions belong to different event frames. When "Zai+PLACE" is in front of the verb, it belongs to a "Stage-Performance Event", and when it is behind of the verb, it belongs to the part related to the terminal point in "Motion Event". Therefore, we can classify them into "Background-behavior/State Construction" and "Terminal Point Construction" respectively. This kind of perspective is convenient for us to understand and explain many linguistic phenomena that were difficult to explain before.
|
|
2
|
从认知图景看“NP1+（的）+NP2”的语义理解 / 卢英顺
// 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning 2020(05) 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020p.3-13 Researches on the semantic understanding of the structure "NP1+（de）+NP2" have been conducted from different theoretical perspectives. However, there is some room to be explored further. The present article attempts to explore some relevant issues from the perspective of the Theory of Cognitive Scene（CS）. The main viewpoints are as follows: the understanding of the structure involves the cognitive elements’ evoking by the relevant CS, esp. the central one. Our understanding of the structure depends on the compatibility of the elements evoked by different CSs and the degree of prominence of those elements per se. It is pointed out as well in this article that when more than one immediate semantic elements function as modifiers, the linear order of them depends on the semantic distance of the elements to the head NP
|
|
3
|
存在歧义格式吗 / 王红旗
// 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning 2020(03) 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020p.3-12 Zhu Dexi(1980) proposes that the existence of grammatical ambiguous sentences is due to the ambiguity of grammatical patterns. According to this view, almost all the grammatical patterns are potentially ambiguous, which leads to an "ambiguous pattern paradox", that is, all grammatical patterns are ambiguous patterns. This paper makes an analysis of the "ambiguous patterns", and points out that some ambiguous patterns are actually not even the same overt grammatical structural patterns, while other patterns do have the same overt grammatical structure but with different covert grammatical meanings. In the strict sense, ambiguous patterns should be grammatical structural patterns of both the same overt and the same covert grammatical meanings. So ambiguous patterns do not exist on this definition.
|
|
4
|
语用推理与极性程度义的获得——以构式“V过A的，没V过这么A的”为例 / 赵彧
// 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning 2020(04) 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020p.30-41 "V guo A de, mei V guo zheme A de" is a construction expressing subjective relative extreme. By comparison, its meaning is to infer that the current cognition in the set is the highest item in the cognitive set formed by the speaker’s personal experience. The formation has gone through from a transparent and deducable grammatical construction that expresses the transitional relationship to a opaque rhetorical construction with idiom characteristics that expresses the extreme degree. The scalar characteristics of the degree reflects the schema characteristics of the mind. Many extreme degree constructions in Chinese follow the pragmatic inference of negates comparative develop to the highest.
|
|
|
|
|