|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
组合式形名结构词长搭配量化研究 / 应学凤, 端木三
// 汉语学习 ,Chinese Language Learning 2020(04) 中国 : 吉林省延吉市, 2020p. 21-29 With regard to word-length preferences in corpus-ased data, there have been studies on "AN" nominals in Chinese, but no yet on "A de N" nominals. We offer a study that fills the gap, using the Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese. It is found that the frequency ranking is 2+2 > 1+2 > 2+1 > 1+1, with 2+2 being the most frequent and 1+1 barely found. The result differs from the frequency ranking of "AN" nominals in the same corpus, which is 1+1 > 2+2 > 1+2 > 2+1. From each length pattern, some prefer "A de N" and some prefer "AN". 2+2 nominals have far more "A de N" than "AN", followed by 2+1 nominals. In contrast, 1+1 nominals are mostly "AN" and hardly any "A de N". Our findings offer quantitative evidence for some observations of Lü(1963) while shedding new light on some other points. For example, both "A de N" and "AN" are frequent for 1+2 nominals, contrary to the view that 1+2 nominals are mostly "A de N".
|
|
|
|
|