- Bài trích
- Nhan đề: Chinese ESOL lecturers’ stance on plagiarism: does knowledge matter./
Tác giả CN
| Lei, Jun. |
Nhan đề
| Chinese ESOL lecturers’ stance on plagiarism: does knowledge matter./ Jun Lei, Guangwei Hu. |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2014. |
Mô tả vật lý
| tr. 41-51. |
Tùng thư
| Oxford University Press. |
Tóm tắt
| Research and discussion on plagiarism have focused predominantly on ESOL students with little attention paid to ESOL teachers. This article reports a study of Chinese university English lecturers’ knowledge of and stance on two intertextual practices (i.e. unacknowledged copying and unattributed paraphrasing) regarded as plagiarism in Anglo-American academia, and, consequently, in the wider international academic community. Drawing on 117 Chinese university English lecturers’ ratings of three short English passages and open-ended justifications of their ratings, the study found that around two-thirds and two-fifths of them recognized unacknowledged copying and paraphrasing as plagiarism, respectively, and held clearly punitive attitudes towards detected plagiarism. It also revealed that while there was a broad consensus of opinion about unacknowledged copying, understandings of unattributed paraphrasing appeared divergent and ambivalent. These findings not only call into question essentialized views of plagiarism that stereotype cultures as either condoning or condemning plagiarism but also suggest a need to raise Chinese university English lecturers’ awareness about Anglo-American notions of plagiarism. |
Thuật ngữ chủ đề
| Ngôn ngữ-Giảng dạy-Tiếng Anh-TVĐHHN |
Từ khóa tự do
| ESOL. |
Từ khóa tự do
| Đạo văn. |
Từ khóa tự do
| English for Speakers of Other Languages. |
Từ khóa tự do
| Plagiarism. |
Từ khóa tự do
| Giảng dạy tiếng Anh. |
Tác giả(bs) CN
| Hu, Guangwei |
Nguồn trích
| ELT journal.- 2014, Vol. 68, No. 1. |
|
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
---|
001 | 31992 |
---|
002 | 2 |
---|
004 | 42331 |
---|
005 | 202007141053 |
---|
008 | 140912s2014 enk eng |
---|
009 | 1 0 |
---|
022 | |a09510893 |
---|
035 | |a1456372897 |
---|
039 | |a20241130160809|bidtocn|c20200714105353|dhuongnt|y20140912161617|zhaont |
---|
041 | 0 |aeng |
---|
044 | |aenk |
---|
100 | 1 |aLei, Jun. |
---|
245 | 10|aChinese ESOL lecturers’ stance on plagiarism: does knowledge matter./|cJun Lei, Guangwei Hu. |
---|
260 | |c2014. |
---|
300 | |atr. 41-51. |
---|
362 | 0 |aVol. 68, No. 1 (Jan. 2014) |
---|
490 | |aOxford University Press. |
---|
520 | |aResearch and discussion on plagiarism have focused predominantly on ESOL students with little attention paid to ESOL teachers. This article reports a study of Chinese university English lecturers’ knowledge of and stance on two intertextual practices (i.e. unacknowledged copying and unattributed paraphrasing) regarded as plagiarism in Anglo-American academia, and, consequently, in the wider international academic community. Drawing on 117 Chinese university English lecturers’ ratings of three short English passages and open-ended justifications of their ratings, the study found that around two-thirds and two-fifths of them recognized unacknowledged copying and paraphrasing as plagiarism, respectively, and held clearly punitive attitudes towards detected plagiarism. It also revealed that while there was a broad consensus of opinion about unacknowledged copying, understandings of unattributed paraphrasing appeared divergent and ambivalent. These findings not only call into question essentialized views of plagiarism that stereotype cultures as either condoning or condemning plagiarism but also suggest a need to raise Chinese university English lecturers’ awareness about Anglo-American notions of plagiarism. |
---|
650 | 17|aNgôn ngữ|xGiảng dạy|zTiếng Anh|2TVĐHHN |
---|
653 | 0 |aESOL. |
---|
653 | 0 |aĐạo văn. |
---|
653 | 0 |aEnglish for Speakers of Other Languages. |
---|
653 | 0 |aPlagiarism. |
---|
653 | 0 |aGiảng dạy tiếng Anh. |
---|
700 | 1 |aHu, Guangwei |
---|
773 | |tELT journal.|g2014, Vol. 68, No. 1. |
---|
890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
---|
| |
Không tìm thấy biểu ghi nào
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|