|
Tác giả CN
| TANG, Jiang-hao. | |
Nhan đề
| 论文莹小说的历史遭遇和文学地位 =On Novels by Wen Ying with a Focus on Their Historical Experiences and Position in Literature. /TANG Jiang-hao. | |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2014 | |
Mô tả vật lý
| 113-123 p. | |
Tùng thư
| 南京大学 | |
Tóm tắt
| Influential and controversial in the Song Dynasty were two novels by Wen Ying: Xiang Shan Ye Lu and Yu Hu Qing Hua. By a study of their category changes in ancient bibliographic records,it is showed that putting the two novels into the category of zi radical — novel fiction — was the most enduring in history,the greatest in influence,and the most acceptable to scholars. Besides political factors,the differences in understanding styles also help explain why Wen Ying and his works were maliciously criticized during the period from the late Northern Song Dynasty to the Southern Song Dynasty. Criticisms,either benign or malicious,may go beyond reasonableness,as is seen in the criticism not only of Wen Ying’s two books,but also of the ancient novels of a narrative and miscellaneous kind. Much of the phenomenon had to do with the fact that in the ancient time scholars thought highly of historical and scripture writings and took novels lightly,and tended to take history and biography as a yardstick or frame of reference in evaluating novels. Therefore,to criticize traditional novels today,we must balance well between different standards,modern or traditional,western or domestic,so that the study is consistent with the real style of Chinese ancient novels. | |
Tóm tắt
| 文莹《湘山野录》、《玉壶清话》是宋代颇具争议和影响的两部杂记类小说。系统梳理二书在历代重要书目载录中所属类别的变迁,发现将二书归入子部小说类,在历史上曾是延续时间最久、影响最大、且广为学者采用的做法。而文莹其人其作由北宋末至南宋时期渐遭诋毁的过程,除政治因素外,对文体的认识差异也是重要原因。褒贬两方虽各有所见,但又各有所偏。这种情况并非仅见于文莹二书的相关批评,在古代叙述杂事类小说批评领域中也是普遍现象。这与古代学者多持重经史而轻小说的学术观念有关,也与他们往往以史传为中心和参照系评价小说有关。因此,今天开展古代小说批评,既需要调整以西方文学标准衡量、弃取中国古代"小说"的做法,也需要调整以史传为中心和参照系的单一批评视角,才能展开符合中国古代"小说"文体之实的研究。 | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 文体. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 小说. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 文学地位. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 文莹. | |
Nguồn trích
| Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 5. | |
Nguồn trích
| 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷 |
| |
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 34509 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 44944 |
|---|
| 008 | 150625s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | |a10077278 |
|---|
| 039 | |y20150625120052|zsvtt |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |achi |
|---|
| 044 | |ach |
|---|
| 100 | 0 |aTANG, Jiang-hao. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|a论文莹小说的历史遭遇和文学地位 =|bOn Novels by Wen Ying with a Focus on Their Historical Experiences and Position in Literature. /|cTANG Jiang-hao. |
|---|
| 260 | |c2014 |
|---|
| 300 | |a113-123 p. |
|---|
| 362 | 0 |aVol. 51, No. 5 (2014) |
|---|
| 490 | 0 |a南京大学 |
|---|
| 520 | |aInfluential and controversial in the Song Dynasty were two novels by Wen Ying: Xiang Shan Ye Lu and Yu Hu Qing Hua. By a study of their category changes in ancient bibliographic records,it is showed that putting the two novels into the category of zi radical — novel fiction — was the most enduring in history,the greatest in influence,and the most acceptable to scholars. Besides political factors,the differences in understanding styles also help explain why Wen Ying and his works were maliciously criticized during the period from the late Northern Song Dynasty to the Southern Song Dynasty. Criticisms,either benign or malicious,may go beyond reasonableness,as is seen in the criticism not only of Wen Ying’s two books,but also of the ancient novels of a narrative and miscellaneous kind. Much of the phenomenon had to do with the fact that in the ancient time scholars thought highly of historical and scripture writings and took novels lightly,and tended to take history and biography as a yardstick or frame of reference in evaluating novels. Therefore,to criticize traditional novels today,we must balance well between different standards,modern or traditional,western or domestic,so that the study is consistent with the real style of Chinese ancient novels. |
|---|
| 520 | |a文莹《湘山野录》、《玉壶清话》是宋代颇具争议和影响的两部杂记类小说。系统梳理二书在历代重要书目载录中所属类别的变迁,发现将二书归入子部小说类,在历史上曾是延续时间最久、影响最大、且广为学者采用的做法。而文莹其人其作由北宋末至南宋时期渐遭诋毁的过程,除政治因素外,对文体的认识差异也是重要原因。褒贬两方虽各有所见,但又各有所偏。这种情况并非仅见于文莹二书的相关批评,在古代叙述杂事类小说批评领域中也是普遍现象。这与古代学者多持重经史而轻小说的学术观念有关,也与他们往往以史传为中心和参照系评价小说有关。因此,今天开展古代小说批评,既需要调整以西方文学标准衡量、弃取中国古代"小说"的做法,也需要调整以史传为中心和参照系的单一批评视角,才能展开符合中国古代"小说"文体之实的研究。 |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a文体. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a小说. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a文学地位. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a文莹. |
|---|
| 773 | |tJournal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences|g2014, Vol. 51, No. 5. |
|---|
| 773 | |t南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学|g2014, 第一卷 |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|