• Bài trích
  • 顾櫰三《补五代史艺文志》小说著录平议 =

Tác giả CN WANG, Li-juan.
Nhan đề 顾櫰三《补五代史艺文志》小说著录平议 =A Comment on the Recordings of Novels of Gu Huaisan’s Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi. /WANG Li-juan.
Thông tin xuất bản 2014
Mô tả vật lý 124-133 p.
Tùng thư 南京大学
Tóm tắt 顾櫰三《补五代史艺文志》搜罗广,刻本多,影响大,错误也多。其著录小说63部,完全无误的仅1部,有错讹的33部,有争议难以断定的29部。错误主要体现在:误收、重出、作者有误、书名有误、卷数有误、作者不实、人书不符等。错讹或因失考,或因粗疏。失考包括误收唐宋著作、误收明代伪书、卷数失考、作者失考等。粗疏包括连带致误、文字误会、同类重出、走眼而误、因形而误、因声而误、残缺遗漏等。一斑可窥全豹,小说著录是整个补志的一个缩影。顾氏长于史学,《补五代史艺文志》出现诸多失误,让人怀疑顾氏并未进行最后的整理、定稿工作,这可能跟其身前身后遭遇有关:屯蹇不遇,客死异乡;子孙零落,后继无人;遗稿流失,若存若亡。因此,在指出其错误的同时,也应给以了解之同情。目前学界关于顾氏《补五代史艺文志》的研究还很欠缺,亦欠深入,此一考察,希望对五代著述整理、古代小说的整理及顾氏其人其作的研究有所裨益。
Tóm tắt In Gu Huaisan’s Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi,there is a wide collection of titles of various editions,with both big popularity and many mistakes,like wrong collection,duplication,errors in authors,titles and number of volumes,etc. Gu Huaisan was good at historiography,but his Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi had so many mistakes which leave us in suspicion whether he completed the work. This may have to do with his miserable life experience: With talents not recognized,he died in an alien land; his descendants died earlier and he had no successor; his manuscripts were lost. Therefore,when pointing out his mistakes in the book,we should understand him sympathetically.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 《补五代史艺文志》.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 小说著录.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 未定本.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 错讹.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 顾櫰三.
Nguồn trích Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences- 2014, Vol. 51, No. 5.
Nguồn trích 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学- 2014, 第一卷
000 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
00134510
0022
00444945
008150625s2014 ch| a 000 0 chi d
0091 0
022|a10077278
039|y20150625120651|zsvtt
0410 |achi
044|ach
1000 |aWANG, Li-juan.
24510|a顾櫰三《补五代史艺文志》小说著录平议 =|bA Comment on the Recordings of Novels of Gu Huaisan’s Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi. /|cWANG Li-juan.
260|c2014
300|a124-133 p.
3620 |aVol. 51, No. 5 (2014)
4900 |a南京大学
520|a顾櫰三《补五代史艺文志》搜罗广,刻本多,影响大,错误也多。其著录小说63部,完全无误的仅1部,有错讹的33部,有争议难以断定的29部。错误主要体现在:误收、重出、作者有误、书名有误、卷数有误、作者不实、人书不符等。错讹或因失考,或因粗疏。失考包括误收唐宋著作、误收明代伪书、卷数失考、作者失考等。粗疏包括连带致误、文字误会、同类重出、走眼而误、因形而误、因声而误、残缺遗漏等。一斑可窥全豹,小说著录是整个补志的一个缩影。顾氏长于史学,《补五代史艺文志》出现诸多失误,让人怀疑顾氏并未进行最后的整理、定稿工作,这可能跟其身前身后遭遇有关:屯蹇不遇,客死异乡;子孙零落,后继无人;遗稿流失,若存若亡。因此,在指出其错误的同时,也应给以了解之同情。目前学界关于顾氏《补五代史艺文志》的研究还很欠缺,亦欠深入,此一考察,希望对五代著述整理、古代小说的整理及顾氏其人其作的研究有所裨益。
5200 |aIn Gu Huaisan’s Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi,there is a wide collection of titles of various editions,with both big popularity and many mistakes,like wrong collection,duplication,errors in authors,titles and number of volumes,etc. Gu Huaisan was good at historiography,but his Bu Wu Dai Shi Yi Wen Zhi had so many mistakes which leave us in suspicion whether he completed the work. This may have to do with his miserable life experience: With talents not recognized,he died in an alien land; his descendants died earlier and he had no successor; his manuscripts were lost. Therefore,when pointing out his mistakes in the book,we should understand him sympathetically.
6530 |a《补五代史艺文志》.
6530 |a小说著录.
6530 |a未定本.
6530 |a错讹.
6530 |a顾櫰三.
773|tJournal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences|g2014, Vol. 51, No. 5.
773|t南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学|g2014, 第一卷
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào