TRA CỨU
  • Bài trích
  • The Effects of Different Lengths of Pretask Planning Time on L2 Learners Oral Test Performance /
Tác giả CN Lanlan, Li
Nhan đề The Effects of Different Lengths of Pretask Planning Time on L2 Learners Oral Test Performance /Lanlan Li, Jiliang Chen and Lan Sun.
Thông tin xuất bản 2015
Mô tả vật lý pages 38–66.
Tùng thư A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect.
Tóm tắt The effect of planning on second language (L2) learners oral performance is a hotly debated topic in the field of second language acquisition. However, studies on the effect of different amounts of planning time have been quite limited, especially in a testing context. The present study investigated the effects of different lengths of pretask planning time (nil, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 5 minutes) on L2 learners oral test performance in terms of both the quantity and quality of the test-takers linguistic output using discourse analytical measures. The findings suggest that the provision of planning time positively influenced both the quantity and quality of oral production; of the three aspects of quality (fluency, accuracy, and complexity), accuracy improved the most, with 1-minute planning time being the threshold that led to significant improvement. Concerning different planning lengths, a positive effect of planning was not always observed in line with the increase of time: too short a time (e.g., 30 seconds) was inadequate for improvement, whereas too long a time (e.g., 5 minutes) engendered a diminishing effect.
Đề mục chủ đề English language--Study and teaching--Periodicals.
Đề mục chủ đề Ngôn ngữ--Giảng dạy--Học tập--TVĐHHN
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát English Learning
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Oral Test Performance
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát L2 Learners
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Pretask Planning Time
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát second language (L2) learners
Tác giả(bs) CN Jiliang, Chen
Tác giả(bs) CN Lan, Sun.
Nguồn trích TESOL Quarterly- Volume 49, Issue 1, March 2015.
000 00000cab a2200000 a 4500
00134831
0022
00445271
008150911s2015 wau eng
0091 0
022|a1545-7249
035|a1456368013
039|a20241209113033|bidtocn|c20150911112201|dngant|y20150911112201|zngant
0410 |aeng
044|awau
1000 |aLanlan, Li
24514|aThe Effects of Different Lengths of Pretask Planning Time on L2 Learners Oral Test Performance /|cLanlan Li, Jiliang Chen and Lan Sun.
260|c2015
300|apages 38–66.
3620 |aVol. 49, N.1 (March 2015)
490|aA Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect.
520|aThe effect of planning on second language (L2) learners oral performance is a hotly debated topic in the field of second language acquisition. However, studies on the effect of different amounts of planning time have been quite limited, especially in a testing context. The present study investigated the effects of different lengths of pretask planning time (nil, 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 5 minutes) on L2 learners oral test performance in terms of both the quantity and quality of the test-takers linguistic output using discourse analytical measures. The findings suggest that the provision of planning time positively influenced both the quantity and quality of oral production; of the three aspects of quality (fluency, accuracy, and complexity), accuracy improved the most, with 1-minute planning time being the threshold that led to significant improvement. Concerning different planning lengths, a positive effect of planning was not always observed in line with the increase of time: too short a time (e.g., 30 seconds) was inadequate for improvement, whereas too long a time (e.g., 5 minutes) engendered a diminishing effect.
65010|aEnglish language|xStudy and teaching|vPeriodicals.
65017|aNgôn ngữ|xGiảng dạy|xHọc tập|2TVĐHHN
6530 |aEnglish Learning
6530 |aOral Test Performance
6530 |aL2 Learners
6530 |aPretask Planning Time
6530 |asecond language (L2) learners
7000 |aJiliang, Chen
7000 |aLan, Sun.
773|tTESOL Quarterly|gVolume 49, Issue 1, March 2015.
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào