Tác giả CN
| TAN, An-kui. |
Nhan đề
| 政治自由主义:一个完整的慎议政治的故事 =Political Liberalism: An Integrated Story of Deliberative Politics /TAN An-kui. |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 : 语言文字工作委员会 , 2015. |
Mô tả vật lý
| 120-128+159 pages. |
Tóm tắt
| According to a lasting criticism,the substantive consensus on justice that John Rawls never gave up seeking after actually weakens the vitality of democratic politics,and this is due not only to the way of choosing the principles of justice from the very beginning,but also to the constraint of public reason in a well-ordered society. But an analysis on the idea of overlapping consensus reveals that the object of the supposed consensus is nothing but public reason,or rather a norm of reasoning,which helps to bring into being a deliberative politics on theoretical stages of both the original position and the well-ordered society. Hence,political liberalism is a united theory of deliberative politics,and this theory extends the mode of deliberative politics beyond the narrow public sphere,so that we can interpret the being of the basic institutional structure with the idea of deliberative democracy. |
Tóm tắt
| 有一种持久的批评认为,罗尔斯所寻求的一直是实质性的正义共识,这导致无论是其原初状态中选择正义原则的方式,还是良序社会中公共理性的约束,都限制了民主政治的活力。但基于对重叠共识理念的分析,我们可以发现,共识的对象仅仅是作为推理规范的公共理性,而公共理性在原初状态与良序社会两个阶段中都塑造了某种形式的慎议政治。因此,政治自由主义首先是一种完整的慎议政治理论,而且它把慎议政治的模式扩展到了狭隘的公共领域之外,从而为我们用慎议民主理念解释基本制度结构的生成提供了空间。 |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 罗尔斯 |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 重叠共识 |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 公共理性 |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 慎议政治 |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 政治自由主义. |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 相互性标准 |
Nguồn trích
| 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University- No. 3, 2015 |
|
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
---|
001 | 35139 |
---|
002 | 2 |
---|
004 | 45582 |
---|
008 | 151008s2015 ch| a 000 0 chi d |
---|
009 | 1 0 |
---|
022 | |a10077278 |
---|
035 | |a1456412835 |
---|
039 | |a20241202114045|bidtocn|c|d|y20151008113529|zngant |
---|
041 | 0 |achi |
---|
044 | |ach |
---|
100 | 0 |aTAN, An-kui. |
---|
245 | 10|a政治自由主义:一个完整的慎议政治的故事 =|bPolitical Liberalism: An Integrated Story of Deliberative Politics /|cTAN An-kui. |
---|
260 | |a新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 :|b语言文字工作委员会 ,|c2015. |
---|
300 | |a120-128+159 pages. |
---|
362 | 0 |aNo. 3 (2015) |
---|
520 | |aAccording to a lasting criticism,the substantive consensus on justice that John Rawls never gave up seeking after actually weakens the vitality of democratic politics,and this is due not only to the way of choosing the principles of justice from the very beginning,but also to the constraint of public reason in a well-ordered society. But an analysis on the idea of overlapping consensus reveals that the object of the supposed consensus is nothing but public reason,or rather a norm of reasoning,which helps to bring into being a deliberative politics on theoretical stages of both the original position and the well-ordered society. Hence,political liberalism is a united theory of deliberative politics,and this theory extends the mode of deliberative politics beyond the narrow public sphere,so that we can interpret the being of the basic institutional structure with the idea of deliberative democracy. |
---|
520 | |a有一种持久的批评认为,罗尔斯所寻求的一直是实质性的正义共识,这导致无论是其原初状态中选择正义原则的方式,还是良序社会中公共理性的约束,都限制了民主政治的活力。但基于对重叠共识理念的分析,我们可以发现,共识的对象仅仅是作为推理规范的公共理性,而公共理性在原初状态与良序社会两个阶段中都塑造了某种形式的慎议政治。因此,政治自由主义首先是一种完整的慎议政治理论,而且它把慎议政治的模式扩展到了狭隘的公共领域之外,从而为我们用慎议民主理念解释基本制度结构的生成提供了空间。 |
---|
653 | 0 |a罗尔斯 |
---|
653 | 0 |a重叠共识 |
---|
653 | 0 |a公共理性 |
---|
653 | 0 |a慎议政治 |
---|
653 | 0 |a政治自由主义. |
---|
653 | 0 |a相互性标准 |
---|
773 | 0 |t南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), Journal of Nanjing University|gNo. 3, 2015 |
---|
890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|