|
Tác giả CN
| 宋, 杰. | |
Nhan đề
| 战后的战犯审判与普遍管辖权:实践、发展与问题 =War Criminals Trial and Universal Jurisdiction:Practice,Development and Problem / 宋杰 | |
Mô tả vật lý
| 91-98 p. | |
Tóm tắt
| After the World War II,the Allies national courts tried some lower suspect war criminals on the base of universal jurisdiction,directly or indirectly.Although some states decided to prevent further prosecutions with the onset of the Cold War,the revival of prosecutions basing on universal jurisdiction happened in the 1980 s,which happened in Israel,Australia,UK and etc.From the perspective of these states’ practice,the issue of excising universal jurisdiction against war criminals is involved with not only the relevant political will but also complicated legal issues which need to be supported by the sophisticated procedures.Prosecutions for war criminals based on universal jurisdiction not only demonstrates the political wills and determinations of the international community to punish war criminals and to end impunity,but also has enriched and developed the theory of universal jurisdiction,providing experiences and references for its further development. | |
Tóm tắt
| 第二次世界大战结束之后,战胜国在对次要战争罪犯进行审判的过程中,部分案例是建立在直接或间接行使普遍管辖权的基础之上的。冷战爆发之后,经过一段时间的"沉寂",到了20世纪80年代,部分国家再次基于普遍管辖权而启动了对战争罪犯的追诉,如以色列、澳大利亚、英国等。从这些国家的实践来看,针对战争犯罪行使普遍管辖权既涉及需要相应政治意愿,还涉及复杂的法律问题,需要精致的程序予以配套支撑。国家针对战争罪犯的普遍管辖实践不仅彰显了国际社会惩治战争罪犯、终结"有罪不罚"的政治意愿和决心,也丰富和发展了普遍管辖权的理论,为普遍管辖权的进一步发展提供了经验和借鉴。 | |
Đề mục chủ đề
| World War II--war crime--punish war criminal--universal jurisdiction. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 惩治战争罪犯 | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 战争罪 | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 普遍管辖权. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 第二次世界大战 | |
Nguồn trích
| Wuhan Universiy Journal.- 2015, Vol. 68. | |
Nguồn trích
| 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.- |
| |
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 36790 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 47251 |
|---|
| 008 | 160223s ch| chi |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | |a16727320 |
|---|
| 035 | |a1456416784 |
|---|
| 039 | |a20241201162058|bidtocn|c|d|y20160223142939|zhangctt |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |achi |
|---|
| 044 | |ach |
|---|
| 100 | 0 |a宋, 杰. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|a战后的战犯审判与普遍管辖权:实践、发展与问题 =|bWar Criminals Trial and Universal Jurisdiction:Practice,Development and Problem /|c 宋杰 |
|---|
| 300 | |a91-98 p. |
|---|
| 362 | 0 |aVol. 68, No. 5 (2015) |
|---|
| 520 | |aAfter the World War II,the Allies national courts tried some lower suspect war criminals on the base of universal jurisdiction,directly or indirectly.Although some states decided to prevent further prosecutions with the onset of the Cold War,the revival of prosecutions basing on universal jurisdiction happened in the 1980 s,which happened in Israel,Australia,UK and etc.From the perspective of these states’ practice,the issue of excising universal jurisdiction against war criminals is involved with not only the relevant political will but also complicated legal issues which need to be supported by the sophisticated procedures.Prosecutions for war criminals based on universal jurisdiction not only demonstrates the political wills and determinations of the international community to punish war criminals and to end impunity,but also has enriched and developed the theory of universal jurisdiction,providing experiences and references for its further development. |
|---|
| 520 | |a第二次世界大战结束之后,战胜国在对次要战争罪犯进行审判的过程中,部分案例是建立在直接或间接行使普遍管辖权的基础之上的。冷战爆发之后,经过一段时间的"沉寂",到了20世纪80年代,部分国家再次基于普遍管辖权而启动了对战争罪犯的追诉,如以色列、澳大利亚、英国等。从这些国家的实践来看,针对战争犯罪行使普遍管辖权既涉及需要相应政治意愿,还涉及复杂的法律问题,需要精致的程序予以配套支撑。国家针对战争罪犯的普遍管辖实践不仅彰显了国际社会惩治战争罪犯、终结"有罪不罚"的政治意愿和决心,也丰富和发展了普遍管辖权的理论,为普遍管辖权的进一步发展提供了经验和借鉴。 |
|---|
| 650 | 10|aWorld War II|xwar crime|xpunish war criminal|xuniversal jurisdiction. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a惩治战争罪犯 |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a战争罪 |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a普遍管辖权. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a第二次世界大战 |
|---|
| 773 | |tWuhan Universiy Journal.|g2015, Vol. 68. |
|---|
| 773 | |t武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷. |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|