NTU Bản quyền thuộc về Thư viện Trường Đại học Hà Nội
Bộ GD&ĐT
Tra cứu văn bằng
E-Learning
E-Office
TRA CỨU
  • Bài trích
  • Nhan đề: 战争罪中媒体仇视宣传的责任——纽伦堡后续审判和国际军事法庭三起相关案例之比较 =
Tác giả CN 张, 颖军.
Nhan đề 战争罪中媒体仇视宣传的责任——纽伦堡后续审判和国际军事法庭三起相关案例之比较 = The Responsibility of Hate Speech under International Criminal Law / 张颖军；刘斯尧.
Mô tả vật lý 99-105 p.
Tóm tắt After the second world war,two hate speech cases were judged by the International Military Tribunal(IMT).At present,researchers thought the legal system about the media was formed from the two cases.However,after the judgments,the U.S.military court has dealed with another case which was in regard to the news leder of Nazi whose name was Otto Dietrich.Although the same charges against the defendants,the tribunals issued totally different judgments:the crimes against humanity conviction of Nazi newspaper editor Julius Streicher and the acquittal on the same charge of Third Reich Radio Division Chief Hans Fritzsche by IMT,whereas the Reich Press Chief Otto Dietrich,the similar status with the latter,was convicted despite the fact that the charged language did not directly call for violence.Those three cases have significant meaning to define crimes against humanity,crimes of genocide,responsibilities of hate speeches.They have promted the international criminal law by clarify the responsibilities consequential crime.
Tóm tắt 世界反法西斯战争结束后同盟国组织的纽伦堡国际军事法庭审判了两起利用媒体仇视宣传的案件,目前学界一般认为对媒体言论的法律规制大体形成于这两个案例。而在纽伦堡国际军事法庭审判结束后,美国军事法庭的后续审判中对纳粹党新闻领袖奥托·迪特里希的判决几乎被学界所遗忘。面对两个法庭相似罪名的指控,三个案件却出现截然不同的判决。通过展现这两个法庭的判决思路和推理,发现这三起案例对定义危害人类罪、灭绝种族罪、媒体仇视宣传责任意义深刻,促进了国际刑法上间接犯罪责任认定的完善。
Thuật ngữ chủ đề Law of war-media responsibility-hate speech-nuremberg subsequent trials-crimes against humanity.
Từ khóa tự do 仇视宣传
Từ khóa tự do 危害人类罪.
Từ khóa tự do 媒体责任
Từ khóa tự do 战争法
Từ khóa tự do 纽伦堡后续审判
Nguồn trích Wuhan Universiy Journal.- 2015, Vol. 68.
Nguồn trích 武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.-
000 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
00136792
0022
00447253
008160223s ch| chi
0091 0
022|a16727320
035|a1456387668
035|a1456387668
039|a20241129094019|bidtocn|c20241129093719|didtocn|y20160223143727|zngant
0410 |achi
044|ach
1000 |a张, 颖军.
24510|a战争罪中媒体仇视宣传的责任——纽伦堡后续审判和国际军事法庭三起相关案例之比较 =|bThe Responsibility of Hate Speech under International Criminal Law /|c 张颖军；刘斯尧.
300|a99-105 p.
3620 |aVol. 68, No. 5 (2015)
520|aAfter the second world war,two hate speech cases were judged by the International Military Tribunal(IMT).At present,researchers thought the legal system about the media was formed from the two cases.However,after the judgments,the U.S.military court has dealed with another case which was in regard to the news leder of Nazi whose name was Otto Dietrich.Although the same charges against the defendants,the tribunals issued totally different judgments:the crimes against humanity conviction of Nazi newspaper editor Julius Streicher and the acquittal on the same charge of Third Reich Radio Division Chief Hans Fritzsche by IMT,whereas the Reich Press Chief Otto Dietrich,the similar status with the latter,was convicted despite the fact that the charged language did not directly call for violence.Those three cases have significant meaning to define crimes against humanity,crimes of genocide,responsibilities of hate speeches.They have promted the international criminal law by clarify the responsibilities consequential crime.
520|a世界反法西斯战争结束后同盟国组织的纽伦堡国际军事法庭审判了两起利用媒体仇视宣传的案件,目前学界一般认为对媒体言论的法律规制大体形成于这两个案例。而在纽伦堡国际军事法庭审判结束后,美国军事法庭的后续审判中对纳粹党新闻领袖奥托·迪特里希的判决几乎被学界所遗忘。面对两个法庭相似罪名的指控,三个案件却出现截然不同的判决。通过展现这两个法庭的判决思路和推理,发现这三起案例对定义危害人类罪、灭绝种族罪、媒体仇视宣传责任意义深刻,促进了国际刑法上间接犯罪责任认定的完善。
6500 |aLaw of war|xmedia responsibility|xhate speech|xnuremberg subsequent trials|xcrimes against humanity.
6530 |a仇视宣传
6530 |a危害人类罪.
6530 |a媒体责任
6530 |a战争法
6530 |a纽伦堡后续审判
773|tWuhan Universiy Journal.|g2015, Vol. 68.
773|t武汉大学学报. 哲学社会科学版g2015, 第68卷.
890|a0|b0|c0|d0
Không tìm thấy biểu ghi nào

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào