|
Tác giả CN
| 邵斌. | |
Nhan đề
| 英语强化词的构式搭配分析及其可视化研究 /邵斌； 王文斌； 黄丹青； | |
Mô tả vật lý
| tr.379-391. | |
Tóm tắt
| Using the Corpus of Contemporary American English as the source data, this paper adopts collostructional analysis(Stefanowitsch & Gries 2003; Gries & Stefanowitsch 2004) to measure the collostructional strengths between English adjectives and the "amplifier + adjective" construction. Cluster analysis is also used to explore a new classification of English amplifiers. Besides, correspondence analysis is utilized to visualize the semantic distances in a set of maximizers. With these analyses, the paper obtains three main findings: 1) collostructional analysis is largely effective in measuring the association strengths between lexemes and the grammatical constructions associated with them; 2) cluster analysis shows that there does exist a distinction between maximizers and boosters, but the boundary is not clear-cut, as some traditional boosters have already entered the category of maximizers. In addition, such an analysis can measure the degree of similarity between amplifiers of the same group and that of dissimilarity between different groups; 3) the six typical near-synonymous maximizers, i.e. absolutely, completely, entirely, perfectly, totally and utterly, carry nuances of difference in their collocations with adjectives, and correspondence analysis can graphically reflect this by mapping the semantic difference onto the two-dimensional space distances. | |
Tóm tắt
| 本文基于美国当代英语语料库,运用"构式搭配分析法"(Stefanowitsch&Gries2003;Gries&Stefanowitsch 2004),考察英语形容词与"强化词+形容词"构式之间的关联强度,并通过聚类分析对强化词重新分类,借助对应分析对极强词的语义分布差异进行可视化呈现。研究发现:1)"构式搭配分析法"对计算词与相应构式的关联强度较为有效;2)聚类分析的结果证实强化词内部确有极强词与较强词的区分,但两者之间并非泾渭分明,这是由于有些传统的较强词已进入极强词的范畴;同时,聚类分析还能展示同类强化词的相似程度以及不同类别强化词的相异程度;3)6个典型的近义极强词,即absolutely,completely,entirely,perfectly,totally,utterly,在与形容词搭配时存在差异,对应分析将这种搭配差异映射到二维空间距离,由此能呈现极强词的语义差异。 | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 可视化； | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 构式搭配； | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 英语强化词； | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 语料库； | |
Tác giả(bs) CN
| 王文斌. | |
Tác giả(bs) CN
| 黄丹青. | |
Nguồn trích
| 外语教学与研究- vol.49, no.3 (May 2017) |
| |
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 50712 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 61495 |
|---|
| 008 | 171012s ch| a 000 0 chi d |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | |a10000429 |
|---|
| 039 | |y20171012140743|zhuett |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |achi |
|---|
| 044 | |ach |
|---|
| 100 | 0 |a邵斌. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|a英语强化词的构式搭配分析及其可视化研究 /|c邵斌； 王文斌； 黄丹青； |
|---|
| 300 | |atr.379-391. |
|---|
| 520 | |aUsing the Corpus of Contemporary American English as the source data, this paper adopts collostructional analysis(Stefanowitsch & Gries 2003; Gries & Stefanowitsch 2004) to measure the collostructional strengths between English adjectives and the "amplifier + adjective" construction. Cluster analysis is also used to explore a new classification of English amplifiers. Besides, correspondence analysis is utilized to visualize the semantic distances in a set of maximizers. With these analyses, the paper obtains three main findings: 1) collostructional analysis is largely effective in measuring the association strengths between lexemes and the grammatical constructions associated with them; 2) cluster analysis shows that there does exist a distinction between maximizers and boosters, but the boundary is not clear-cut, as some traditional boosters have already entered the category of maximizers. In addition, such an analysis can measure the degree of similarity between amplifiers of the same group and that of dissimilarity between different groups; 3) the six typical near-synonymous maximizers, i.e. absolutely, completely, entirely, perfectly, totally and utterly, carry nuances of difference in their collocations with adjectives, and correspondence analysis can graphically reflect this by mapping the semantic difference onto the two-dimensional space distances. |
|---|
| 520 | |a本文基于美国当代英语语料库,运用"构式搭配分析法"(Stefanowitsch&Gries2003;Gries&Stefanowitsch 2004),考察英语形容词与"强化词+形容词"构式之间的关联强度,并通过聚类分析对强化词重新分类,借助对应分析对极强词的语义分布差异进行可视化呈现。研究发现:1)"构式搭配分析法"对计算词与相应构式的关联强度较为有效;2)聚类分析的结果证实强化词内部确有极强词与较强词的区分,但两者之间并非泾渭分明,这是由于有些传统的较强词已进入极强词的范畴;同时,聚类分析还能展示同类强化词的相似程度以及不同类别强化词的相异程度;3)6个典型的近义极强词,即absolutely,completely,entirely,perfectly,totally,utterly,在与形容词搭配时存在差异,对应分析将这种搭配差异映射到二维空间距离,由此能呈现极强词的语义差异。 |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a可视化； |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a构式搭配； |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a英语强化词； |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a语料库； |
|---|
| 700 | 0 |a王文斌. |
|---|
| 700 | 0 |a黄丹青. |
|---|
| 773 | |t外语教学与研究|gvol.49, no.3 (May 2017) |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|