TRA CỨU
Tác giả CN McNeill, David.
Nhan đề Gesture–speech unity: Phylogenesis, ontogenesis, and microgenesis / David McNeill
Mô tả vật lý p. 137 - p. 184
Tóm tắt This paper outlines an argument for how development in child speech and gesture could shed light on language evolution: child acquisition can be thought of as two types of acquisition, one of which goes extinct (gesture-first, Acquisition 1) and is replaced by another (gesture–speech unity, Acquisition 2). For ontogenesis, this implies that children acquire two languages, one of which is extinct, and which again goes extinct in ontogenesis (it continues as “gestures of silence” rather than as gestures of speech). There is no way to get from Acquisition 1 to Acquisition 2. They are on different tracks. Even when they converge in the same sentence, as they sometimes do, they alternate and do not combine. I propose that the 3~4 year timing of Acquisition 2 relates to the natural selection of a kind of gestural self–response I call “Mead’s Loop”, which took place in a certain psychological milieu at the origin of language. This milieu emerges now in ontogenesis at 3~4 years and with it Mead’s Loop. It is self-aware agency, on which a self-response depends. Other developments, such as theory of mind and shared intentionality, likewise depend on it and also emerge around the same time. The prefrontal cortex, anchoring a ring of language centers in the brain, matures at that point as well, another factor influencing the late timing. On the other hand, a third acquisition, speech evoking adult attachment, begins at (or even before) birth, as shown by a number of studies, and provides continuity through the two acquisitions and extinction.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Gesture.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Evolution.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Development.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Phát triển.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Cử chỉ ngôn luận.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Mirror neurons and speech.
Nguồn trích Language, Interaction and Acquisition- Volume 5, Issue 2, Jan 2014.
000 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00153211
0022
004832AF75A-04B4-4997-A36B-CE7986DB5E37
005201810111126
008081223s vm| vie
0091 0
039|y20181011112558|zhuett
0410 |aeng
1001 |aMcNeill, David.
24510|aGesture–speech unity: |bPhylogenesis, ontogenesis, and microgenesis / |cDavid McNeill
30010|ap. 137 - p. 184
520 |aThis paper outlines an argument for how development in child speech and gesture could shed light on language evolution: child acquisition can be thought of as two types of acquisition, one of which goes extinct (gesture-first, Acquisition 1) and is replaced by another (gesture–speech unity, Acquisition 2). For ontogenesis, this implies that children acquire two languages, one of which is extinct, and which again goes extinct in ontogenesis (it continues as “gestures of silence” rather than as gestures of speech). There is no way to get from Acquisition 1 to Acquisition 2. They are on different tracks. Even when they converge in the same sentence, as they sometimes do, they alternate and do not combine. I propose that the 3~4 year timing of Acquisition 2 relates to the natural selection of a kind of gestural self–response I call “Mead’s Loop”, which took place in a certain psychological milieu at the origin of language. This milieu emerges now in ontogenesis at 3~4 years and with it Mead’s Loop. It is self-aware agency, on which a self-response depends. Other developments, such as theory of mind and shared intentionality, likewise depend on it and also emerge around the same time. The prefrontal cortex, anchoring a ring of language centers in the brain, matures at that point as well, another factor influencing the late timing. On the other hand, a third acquisition, speech evoking adult attachment, begins at (or even before) birth, as shown by a number of studies, and provides continuity through the two acquisitions and extinction.
6530 |aGesture.
6530 |aEvolution.
6530 |aDevelopment.
6530 |aPhát triển.
6530 |aCử chỉ ngôn luận.
6530 |aMirror neurons and speech.
7730 |t Language, Interaction and Acquisition|gVolume 5, Issue 2, Jan 2014.
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào