TRA CỨU
  • Bài trích
  • 二语学习者反义复合词词义识解的影响因素 /
Tác giả CN 刘玉倩
Nhan đề 二语学习者反义复合词词义识解的影响因素 / 刘玉倩, 孟凯.
Mô tả vật lý tr.69-77
Tóm tắt 本研究通过5×2被试内两因素混合测试,分析5种语义关系类型和2种母语文字背景对中级二语者反义复合词词义识解的影响。结果显示:语义关系类型和母语文字背景对二语者反义复合词的词义识解都有影响,两因素之间存在一定程度的交互作用,且交互作用有倾向性;5种语义关系类型的反义复合词词义识解难度为:加合型<概括型<选择型<偏义型<引申型("<"表示"易于")。针对二语者词义识解的倾向和特点,本文提出反义复合词需按语义关系类型分类教学、教学顺序宜与词义识解难度匹配等教学建议
Tóm tắt On the basis of written examination through the form of 5×2 two factors of text, this study inspects the effects of the types of semantic relation(direct meaning and indirect meaning which can be further categorized into five types) and language background(the system of Chinese characters and non-character-writing) on the intermediate level of CSL learners’ word-meaning construal of opposite compounds. According to the result of the experimental data analysis, we can conclude that it is difficult for intermediate CSL learners to indentify and understand opposite compounds. The types of semantic relation and language background both have an effect on them,and there is some interactive impact, which has a tendency, between the two factors. There exist difficulty levels of CSL learners’ construing the five types of semantic relation of opposite compounds: addition < generalization < selection < partial meaning < extended meaning. This paper also provides some advice for CSL teaching and learning of opposite compounds such as 1)adopting morpheme pedagogy in teaching the addition type, context method in extended meaning type, and combination of the above two methods in other three types; 2) matching the pedagogical order to the difficulty levels of CSL learners’ construing five types of semantic relation of opposite compounds.
Đề mục chủ đề 反义复合词
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Tiếng Trung Quốc
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Phương ngữ
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Quan hệ ngữ nghĩa
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 汉语第二语言学习者
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát 词义识解
Nguồn trích 汉语学习- No.3/2019
000 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00157056
0022
004662DFE7F-0789-4EEF-B48A-76EA89FD1C42
005202007031044
008081223s vm| vie
0091 0
035|a1456414145
039|a20241203082648|bidtocn|c20200703104417|dthuvt|y20191126092747|zthuvt
0410 |achi
044 |ach
1000 |a刘玉倩
24510|a二语学习者反义复合词词义识解的影响因素 / |c刘玉倩, 孟凯.
30010|atr.69-77
520 |a本研究通过5×2被试内两因素混合测试,分析5种语义关系类型和2种母语文字背景对中级二语者反义复合词词义识解的影响。结果显示:语义关系类型和母语文字背景对二语者反义复合词的词义识解都有影响,两因素之间存在一定程度的交互作用,且交互作用有倾向性;5种语义关系类型的反义复合词词义识解难度为:加合型<概括型<选择型<偏义型<引申型("<"表示"易于")。针对二语者词义识解的倾向和特点,本文提出反义复合词需按语义关系类型分类教学、教学顺序宜与词义识解难度匹配等教学建议
520|aOn the basis of written examination through the form of 5×2 two factors of text, this study inspects the effects of the types of semantic relation(direct meaning and indirect meaning which can be further categorized into five types) and language background(the system of Chinese characters and non-character-writing) on the intermediate level of CSL learners’ word-meaning construal of opposite compounds. According to the result of the experimental data analysis, we can conclude that it is difficult for intermediate CSL learners to indentify and understand opposite compounds. The types of semantic relation and language background both have an effect on them,and there is some interactive impact, which has a tendency, between the two factors. There exist difficulty levels of CSL learners’ construing the five types of semantic relation of opposite compounds: addition < generalization < selection < partial meaning < extended meaning. This paper also provides some advice for CSL teaching and learning of opposite compounds such as 1)adopting morpheme pedagogy in teaching the addition type, context method in extended meaning type, and combination of the above two methods in other three types; 2) matching the pedagogical order to the difficulty levels of CSL learners’ construing five types of semantic relation of opposite compounds.
65010|a反义复合词
6530 |aTiếng Trung Quốc
6530 |aPhương ngữ
6530 |aQuan hệ ngữ nghĩa
6530 |a汉语第二语言学习者
6530 |a词义识解
773|t汉语学习|gNo.3/2019
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào