- Bài trích
- Nhan đề: Building verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots /
|
Tác giả CN
| Coon, Jessica. | |
Nhan đề
| Building verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots / Jessica Coon. | |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2019. | |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2019. | |
Mô tả vật lý
| p. 35-81. | |
Tóm tắt
| This paper offers an in-depth look at roots and verb stem morphology in Chuj (Mayan) in order to address a larger question: when it comes to the formation of verb stems, what information is contributed by the root, and what is contributed by the functional heads? I show first that roots in Chuj are not acategorical in the strict sense (cf. Borer 2005), but must be grouped into classes based on their stem-forming possibilities. Root class does not map directly to surface lexical category, but does determine which functional heads (i.e. valence morphology) may merge with the root. Second, I show that while the introduction of the external argument, along with clausal licensing and agreement generally, are all governed by higher functional heads, the presence or absence of an internal argument is dictated by the root. Specifically, I show that transitive roots in Chuj always combine with an internal argument, whether it be (i) a full DP, (ii) a bare pseudo-incorporated NP, or (iii) an implicit object in an antipassive. In the spirit of work such as Levinson (2007, 2014), I connect this to the semantic type of the root; root class reflects semantic type, and semantic type affects the root’s combinatorial properties. This work also contributes to the discussion of how valence morphology operates. In line with works such as Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer (2006), I argue that valence morphology applies directly to roots, rather than to some ‘inherent valence’ of a verb. | |
Thuật ngữ chủ đề
| English language-Verbs-TVĐHHN. | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Antipassive | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Argument structure | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Phân tích ngôn ngữ | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Diễn ngôn | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Roots | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Động từ | |
Từ khóa tự do
| Gốc động từ | |
Nguồn trích
| Journal of Linguistics- 2019, Issue 1 |
| |
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 58404 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 26D3B66A-44C1-4C01-BFBF-E14E65410535 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007171105 |
|---|
| 008 | 160304s2019 vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | |a08683409 |
|---|
| 035 | |a1456411524 |
|---|
| 039 | |a20241202170409|bidtocn|c20200717110505|dhuongnt|y20200401114514|zthuvt |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |aenk |
|---|
| 044 | |aeng |
|---|
| 100 | 1 |aCoon, Jessica. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|aBuilding verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots / |cJessica Coon. |
|---|
| 260 | |c2019. |
|---|
| 260 | |c2019. |
|---|
| 300 | |ap. 35-81. |
|---|
| 362 | 0 |aNo 55 (Issue 1), 2019. |
|---|
| 520 | |aThis paper offers an in-depth look at roots and verb stem morphology in Chuj (Mayan) in order to address a larger question: when it comes to the formation of verb stems, what information is contributed by the root, and what is contributed by the functional heads? I show first that roots in Chuj are not acategorical in the strict sense (cf. Borer 2005), but must be grouped into classes based on their stem-forming possibilities. Root class does not map directly to surface lexical category, but does determine which functional heads (i.e. valence morphology) may merge with the root. Second, I show that while the introduction of the external argument, along with clausal licensing and agreement generally, are all governed by higher functional heads, the presence or absence of an internal argument is dictated by the root. Specifically, I show that transitive roots in Chuj always combine with an internal argument, whether it be (i) a full DP, (ii) a bare pseudo-incorporated NP, or (iii) an implicit object in an antipassive. In the spirit of work such as Levinson (2007, 2014), I connect this to the semantic type of the root; root class reflects semantic type, and semantic type affects the root’s combinatorial properties. This work also contributes to the discussion of how valence morphology operates. In line with works such as Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer (2006), I argue that valence morphology applies directly to roots, rather than to some ‘inherent valence’ of a verb. |
|---|
| 650 | 17|aEnglish language|xVerbs|2TVĐHHN. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aAntipassive |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aArgument structure |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aPhân tích ngôn ngữ |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aDiễn ngôn |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aRoots |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aĐộng từ |
|---|
| 653 | 0|aGốc động từ |
|---|
| 773 | |tJournal of Linguistics|g2019, Issue 1 |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không tìm thấy biểu ghi nào
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|