TRA CỨU
  • Bài trích
  • Gurindji nasal cluster dissimilation as trigger deletion /
Tác giả CN Stanton, Juliet
Nhan đề Gurindji nasal cluster dissimilation as trigger deletion / Juliet Stanton
Thông tin xuất bản United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2020
Mô tả vật lý p.157 - 195
Tóm tắt Processes of unbounded spreading are often claimed to be myopic (e.g. Wilson 2003, McCarthy 2009): the ability of some feature [F] to spread from some segment z to some segment y does not depend on its ability to spread from y to x. Recent work (e.g. Walker 2010, 2014; Jardine 2016) has however cast doubt on the universality of this claim. This paper contributes to the discussion on (non-)myopia on by suggesting that a kind of non-myopic process, trigger deletion, is attested in Gurindji (Pama–Nyungan, McConvell 1988): when the spreading domain contains a certain kind of blocking segment, the spreading trigger deletes. In order to capture this pattern, as well as the extant typology of non-myopic processes, I argue that any successful analysis of unbounded spreading must allow surface candidates to be globally evaluated.
Đề mục chủ đề Linguistics--Phonology
Đề mục chủ đề Ngôn ngữ học--Âm vị học
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Ngôn ngữ học
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Âm vị học
Nguồn trích Journal of Linguistics- Volume 56 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2020
Tệp tin điện tử https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/abs/gurindji-nasal-cluster-dissimilation-as-trigger-deletion/270A57B6EB3431BF65142033CB2019E8
000 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500
00159945
0022
004C5AC61D4-0920-46D2-A81A-E54939C59303
005202105051635
008081223s2020 vm| vie
0091 0
022 |a00222267
035|a1456369051
039|a20241125211822|bidtocn|c20210505163514|dtult|y20201204140102|zhuongnt
0410 |aeng
044 |aenk
1001 |aStanton, Juliet
24510|aGurindji nasal cluster dissimilation as trigger deletion / |cJuliet Stanton
260 |aUnited Kingdom : |bCambridge University Press, |c2020
300 |ap.157 - 195
520 |aProcesses of unbounded spreading are often claimed to be myopic (e.g. Wilson 2003, McCarthy 2009): the ability of some feature [F] to spread from some segment z to some segment y does not depend on its ability to spread from y to x. Recent work (e.g. Walker 2010, 2014; Jardine 2016) has however cast doubt on the universality of this claim. This paper contributes to the discussion on (non-)myopia on by suggesting that a kind of non-myopic process, trigger deletion, is attested in Gurindji (Pama–Nyungan, McConvell 1988): when the spreading domain contains a certain kind of blocking segment, the spreading trigger deletes. In order to capture this pattern, as well as the extant typology of non-myopic processes, I argue that any successful analysis of unbounded spreading must allow surface candidates to be globally evaluated.
65010|aLinguistics|xPhonology
65010|aNgôn ngữ học|xÂm vị học
6530 |aNgôn ngữ học
6530 |aÂm vị học
773 |tJournal of Linguistics|gVolume 56 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2020
856 |uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/abs/gurindji-nasal-cluster-dissimilation-as-trigger-deletion/270A57B6EB3431BF65142033CB2019E8
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào