• Bài trích
  • Accounting for capital: the evolution of an idea /

Tác giả CN Nobesa, Christopher.
Nhan đề Accounting for capital: the evolution of an idea /Christopher Nobesa.
Thông tin xuất bản London, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales] Abingdon, UK : Routledge, Taylor & Francis , 2015.
Mô tả vật lý pages 413-441.
Tùng thư Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
Tóm tắt The word ‘capital’ has many meanings, within and beyond business. In accounting, it was originally a credit concept but has many uses related to assets. In economics and tax, it has exclusively asset meanings. This paper investigates the development of the concept of capital, focussing on accounting and related disciplines, especially in the UK. Even as a credit term, ‘capital’ can be as narrow as original equity or wide enough to include debt. A credit/debit confusion can be seen in Pacioli s treatise and through to recent documents by standard setters. At various dates, amounts called ‘capital’ have been shown on different sides of the balance sheet. Capital maintenance is central to the measurement of income for various purposes. It was thrown off course in 1889 by a legal case which seems to have been influenced by the double-account system, which also had echoes in economics. However, the conventional accountants’ view was re-established in 1980 because of an EU Directive. Maintenance of capital (both credit and debit forms) was much discussed in the 1970s in a period of high inflation. The concept of equity began to become clear with the separation of provisions and reserves (in the 1940s) and when liabilities were defined (from the 1960s). However, accounting practice departs from the definition and it measures liabilities in various ways, so that there is still no clear concept of equity capital. A number of policy implications are set out in the paper.
Đề mục chủ đề Accounting--Periodicals.
Đề mục chủ đề Business--Periodicals.
Đề mục chủ đề Accounting--Research--Periodicals.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Accounting
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Business.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Accounting for capital
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Management and Accounting
Nguồn trích Accounting and Business Research.- Volume 45, N4, 2015.
000 00000cab a2200000 a 4500
00134837
0022
00445277
008150911s2015 enk eng
0091 0
022|a00014788
039|a20150911153013|bngant|y20150911153013|zngant
0410 |aeng
044|aenk
1001 |aNobesa, Christopher.
24510|aAccounting for capital: the evolution of an idea /|cChristopher Nobesa.
260|aLondon, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales] Abingdon, UK :|bRoutledge, Taylor & Francis ,|c2015.
300|apages 413-441.
3620 |aVol. 45, N.4 (2015)
490|aInstitute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
520|aThe word ‘capital’ has many meanings, within and beyond business. In accounting, it was originally a credit concept but has many uses related to assets. In economics and tax, it has exclusively asset meanings. This paper investigates the development of the concept of capital, focussing on accounting and related disciplines, especially in the UK. Even as a credit term, ‘capital’ can be as narrow as original equity or wide enough to include debt. A credit/debit confusion can be seen in Pacioli s treatise and through to recent documents by standard setters. At various dates, amounts called ‘capital’ have been shown on different sides of the balance sheet. Capital maintenance is central to the measurement of income for various purposes. It was thrown off course in 1889 by a legal case which seems to have been influenced by the double-account system, which also had echoes in economics. However, the conventional accountants’ view was re-established in 1980 because of an EU Directive. Maintenance of capital (both credit and debit forms) was much discussed in the 1970s in a period of high inflation. The concept of equity began to become clear with the separation of provisions and reserves (in the 1940s) and when liabilities were defined (from the 1960s). However, accounting practice departs from the definition and it measures liabilities in various ways, so that there is still no clear concept of equity capital. A number of policy implications are set out in the paper.
65000|aAccounting|vPeriodicals.
65000|aBusiness|vPeriodicals.
65010|aAccounting|xResearch|vPeriodicals.
6530 |aAccounting
6530 |aBusiness.
6530 |aAccounting for capital
6530 |aManagement and Accounting
773|tAccounting and Business Research.|gVolume 45, N4, 2015.
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào