TRA CỨU
  • Bài trích
  • Building verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots /
Tác giả CN Coon, Jessica.
Nhan đề Building verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots / Jessica Coon.
Thông tin xuất bản 2019.
Thông tin xuất bản 2019.
Mô tả vật lý p. 35-81.
Tóm tắt This paper offers an in-depth look at roots and verb stem morphology in Chuj (Mayan) in order to address a larger question: when it comes to the formation of verb stems, what information is contributed by the root, and what is contributed by the functional heads? I show first that roots in Chuj are not acategorical in the strict sense (cf. Borer 2005), but must be grouped into classes based on their stem-forming possibilities. Root class does not map directly to surface lexical category, but does determine which functional heads (i.e. valence morphology) may merge with the root. Second, I show that while the introduction of the external argument, along with clausal licensing and agreement generally, are all governed by higher functional heads, the presence or absence of an internal argument is dictated by the root. Specifically, I show that transitive roots in Chuj always combine with an internal argument, whether it be (i) a full DP, (ii) a bare pseudo-incorporated NP, or (iii) an implicit object in an antipassive. In the spirit of work such as Levinson (2007, 2014), I connect this to the semantic type of the root; root class reflects semantic type, and semantic type affects the root’s combinatorial properties. This work also contributes to the discussion of how valence morphology operates. In line with works such as Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer (2006), I argue that valence morphology applies directly to roots, rather than to some ‘inherent valence’ of a verb.
Đề mục chủ đề English language--Verbs--TVĐHHN.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Antipassive
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Argument structure
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Phân tích ngôn ngữ
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Diễn ngôn
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Roots
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Động từ
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát Gốc động từ
Nguồn trích Journal of Linguistics- 2019, Issue 1
000 00000nab a2200000 a 4500
00158404
0022
00426D3B66A-44C1-4C01-BFBF-E14E65410535
005202007171105
008160304s2019 vm| vie
0091 0
022|a08683409
039|a20200717110505|bhuongnt|c20200413144157|dtult|y20200401114514|zthuvt
0410 |aenk
044|aeng
1001 |aCoon, Jessica.
24510|aBuilding verbs in Chuj : Consequences for the nature of roots / |cJessica Coon.
260|c2019.
260|c2019.
300|ap. 35-81.
3620 |aNo 55 (Issue 1), 2019.
520|aThis paper offers an in-depth look at roots and verb stem morphology in Chuj (Mayan) in order to address a larger question: when it comes to the formation of verb stems, what information is contributed by the root, and what is contributed by the functional heads? I show first that roots in Chuj are not acategorical in the strict sense (cf. Borer 2005), but must be grouped into classes based on their stem-forming possibilities. Root class does not map directly to surface lexical category, but does determine which functional heads (i.e. valence morphology) may merge with the root. Second, I show that while the introduction of the external argument, along with clausal licensing and agreement generally, are all governed by higher functional heads, the presence or absence of an internal argument is dictated by the root. Specifically, I show that transitive roots in Chuj always combine with an internal argument, whether it be (i) a full DP, (ii) a bare pseudo-incorporated NP, or (iii) an implicit object in an antipassive. In the spirit of work such as Levinson (2007, 2014), I connect this to the semantic type of the root; root class reflects semantic type, and semantic type affects the root’s combinatorial properties. This work also contributes to the discussion of how valence morphology operates. In line with works such as Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer (2006), I argue that valence morphology applies directly to roots, rather than to some ‘inherent valence’ of a verb.
65017|aEnglish language|xVerbs|2TVĐHHN.
6530 |aAntipassive
6530 |aArgument structure
6530 |aPhân tích ngôn ngữ
6530 |aDiễn ngôn
6530 |aRoots
6530 |aĐộng từ
6530|aGốc động từ
773|tJournal of Linguistics|g2019, Issue 1
890|a0|b0|c0|d0

Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào