Dòng Nội dung
1
A Philosophical Interpretation of Ontology about the Inner Chapters of Chuang-tzu / Cheng Zhongying // Journal of Huazhong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences) 2014, Vol 53, N.6

p62-p68

This article is a philosophical interpretation of ontology about the inner chapters of Chuang-tzu, which shows us a dialectical process about the ontologies existence. The seven articles in Chuang-tzu can be divided into two categories. On or hand, there are strong dialectical thoughts of ontology in The Happy Excursion , On the Equality of Things and The Philosopher-King. On the other hand, The Fundamental for the Cultivation of Life, Human World, The Evidence of Virtue Complete and The Great Teacher show us dialectical thoughts of human potential. After the combination ( these two aspects, the world ontology and the human ontology will be integrated, an then Chuang-tzu s special dialectic philosophy of practice ontology will come true

2
早期道家著作中的“礼”与“理”/ 庞慧 // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and social sciences 2013, Vol. 4 // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2013, 第四集
南京: 南京大学学报编委会, 2013
tr. 85-94

“礼”、“理”之辩,是中国思想史上持续数千年的话题。早期道家著作《老子》《庄子》中二字的用法,为二者在中国思想史上的关系定下了基调。“礼”字已见于甲骨文,从春秋时期开始,“礼”被逐渐赋予了形而上的阐释。“理”字则罕见于战国以前的文字资料,直到战国中期,对“理”的理论化改造才展开。《老子》无“理”字。《老子》中的“礼”和“义”被分开,“礼”仅指外在仪式,属“下德”之末,距“道”最远。《庄子》继承了《老子》中“礼”字的用法,并沿着《老子》重视“礼”之内在情质的思路,抨击儒家拘守的“世俗之礼”,主张安于“性命之情”。《庄子》引入了“理”概念,作为儒家式“礼”概念的对立面和替代品。《庄子》的“理”概念补足了老子“道”论缺环,从此“理”和“道”遂成为不同学派广泛采用的一对理论概念,产生了重要的理论回响。

3
试说《老子》之“道”及其中含蕴的历史观 = Dao in Laozi and Its Philosophy of History. / LIU Jia-he. // Journal of Nanjing University: Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences 2014, Vol. 51, No. 4. // 南京大学学报 : 哲学社会科学 2014, 第一卷
2014
tr. 87-98.

With the examination of its inner coherence,Dao in Laozi can be comprehended in terms of the contradictions in its historical development.Dao can be a constant Dao that cannot be told of,or a non-constant Dao that can be told of.By the same token,a name can be a constant name that cannot be named or a non-constant name that can be named.The positive and the negative turn to be two sides of the same contradictory entity.Hegel said,in his Lectures on the History of Philosophy,that Dao in Laozi takes nihility and voidness as its supreme essence.If so,Laozi’s philosophy would still be on its most preliminary stage.Being mostly dealt with in Laozi,the concept of Dao,as to its meaningfulness,development and usefulness,is to be approached to in the way from the abstract to the concrete.The first way from the abstract to the concrete is that from Dao to Li( logic),and then to the images and the numbers.If we turn our eye to the social history of human beings,then the first step from the abstract to the concrete will be the development from Dao to De( virtue).Through De,Dao gives its concrete functions and usefulnesses in the social world.De has the same inner contradictions as Dao does.As we can see that the logical development in Laozi from Dao to De,to Ren( benevolence) and Yi( righteousness) and to Li( propriety) is an evolutionary development from one contradiction to another,and this is exactly the development of human history and culture.Each following stage will be an inevitable consequence of its predecessor.Therefore,the development is of necessity and inevitability.It is a great breakthrough in the ancient history of both Chinese and Western philosophies,that Laozi found,from his treatment of the inner contractions in Dao and De,the necessity and inevitability of historical development.