|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
“一M比一M+VP”构式的形式和功能 = The Form and Function of the Construction “Yi M Bi Yi M + VP” / 陈满华; 赵志强.
// 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) 2015, No.4. 吉林省延吉市 : 双月, 2015.p. 3-13. "一M比一M+VP"构式有实比和虚比两种类型,又可分为四种格式。该构式的形式特征主要有"M"泛化、"一M比一M"固化等;句法功能方面,"一M"有指代性质,"比"有关系化趋势,"一M比一M+VP"的句法功能存在变异和萎缩现象;语义方面,"一M比一M"具有三个语义特征,VP有五种语义类型,整个构式有两种构式义,它们分别有不同的成因;"一M比一M+VP"的语用特征主要表现在主观性和蕴含义两个方面;"一M比一M+VP"的形式和功能反映了其作为典型语法构式的特征.
|
|
2
|
定中复合名词中的构式强迫 = Construction Coercion in Modifier-Head Compound Nouns. / Song Zuoyan;.
// Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue. 2014, Vol. 28. 508-518 p. This paper aims to investigate sense shift of head elements in modifier-head compound nouns from the prospective of construction coercion.Construction coercion is triggered by the need to resolve semantic conflict or type mismatch.It may result in sense shift of some elements in a construction.The modifier-head construction may coerce the head element into nominalization,generalization or morphemization,respectively caused by category mismatch,semantic modification mismatch and syllable-morpheme mismatch.It turns out that construction coercion affects both the construction and its elements,because they interact with each other.Construction coercion can not only provide a systematic explanation for nominalization,generalization and morphemization,but also help us better understand the so-called head-modifier compound nouns in Chinese.
|
|
3
|
现代汉语行业语语义泛化的内在原因探析=The Intrinsic Reasons for Semantic Generalization of Jargons in Modern Chinese Language/ 梁永红.
// Applied linguistics. 2015, No.4. 2015.96-102 p. The semantic generalization of jargons is universal in modern Chinese language. The Modern Chinese Dictionary( 6thedition) includes 501 jargons with semantic generalization. In terms of distribution,these jargons have characteristics of long existing time and close relations with daily life; in terms of specific jargons, the degree of socialization and semantic transparency are two factors influencing semantic generalization;in terms of the generalization rule,those jargons with complete semantic transparency retain their characteristics in the generalization,while those with some or high degree of obscureness tend to retain the surface meaning in the generalization.
|
|
|
|
|