|
Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
|
1
|
L’acquisition phonologique, de Jakobson aux modèles fréquentiels / Naomi Yamaguchi.
// Langages. 2015, Vol. 198. 2015p. 31-49. Cet article passe en revue quelques théories traitant de l’ordre d’acquisition des consonnes par les enfants, en essayant de rendre compte de tendances universelles et d’expliquer les différences inter-langues et individuelles. Nous confrontons les propositions universalistes de Jakobson (1941) et celles de modèles fréquentiels à des données longitudinales d’enfants francophones. Face aux mauvaises prédictions de ces modèles, nous proposons un modèle mixte, combinant principes phonologiques universels et fréquence des traits, qui rend compte de l’intégralité des données.
|
|
2
|
Towards the use of phonological markedness and extraprosodicity in accounting for morphological errors in Specific Language Impairment / Öner Özçelik
// Language, Interaction and Acquisition 8.2 (2017) p.234-272 Certain grammatical morphemes are variably produced in the speech of children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Previous research tends to view this as a consequence of either a deficit in linguistic knowledge or a limitation in processing capacity; however, both approaches raise problems. For example, linguistic accounts are unable to explain why these children’s problems are mostly with production rather than comprehension. Processing accounts, on the other hand, have difficulty explaining why affected children have differing levels of problems with grammatical morphemes that are similar on the surface (e.g. English plural -s vs. third person singular -s). In this paper, a new, phonological account is proposed which avoids these problems, and better captures the wide array of data presented in the literature. It is proposed that children with SLI have problems with organizing segmental data into prosodic structures that are linguistically highly marked, in particular those that involve various forms of extraprosodicity.
|
|
3
|
上海手语的底层手型与特征赋值 / 张吉生, 伍艳红.
// 当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics. 2018/4-Volume 20 2018.p. 572-586. Sign is the free minimal linguistic unit which carries meaning in sign language. Like vocal language, the free minimal meaningful unit of sign language is also composed of meaningless elements which refer to handshapes, orientations, positions and movements. Of all the four kinds of meaningless elements, handshapes are very similar to segments in vocal language in terms of structure and function. Thus, handshapes in sign language are known as handshape segments. It is the most fundamental task i... More
|
|
|
|
|