Dòng
|
Nội dung
|
1
|
|
2
|
语言共性和个性在汉语双宾语构式二语习得中的体现 = Linguistic Universals and Cross-linguistic Variations in the Second Language Acquisition of Chinese Double-object Construction. / 李昱.
// Language teaching and linguistic studies. 2015, No. 1 (171)
// 语言教学与研究 2015, 第1卷 (171) 10-21 p. Based on the cross-linguistic studies of ditransitive constructions,the present paper examines how linguistic universals and some cross-linguistic differences associated with ditransitive constructions are reflected in second language acquisition.The primary objects of this paper are the acquisition of ditransitive verbs and the direct and indirect objects.Both linguistic universals and variations are found in the interlanguage of Chinese L2 learners.The interlanguage data we have adopted indicate some universal patterns,regardless of various L1 backgrounds,involving the high frequency of prototypical ditransitive verbs,their relative low error rates and the animacy of the arguments,etc.On the contrary,a subcategory of ditransitive verbs,namely,the"obtain"class verbs are distinctive for their low frequency and relative high error rates in our dataset,which is also a verb class less frequently found cross-linguistically.Nevertheless,some language universals concerning the ditransitive constructions,such as the definiteness of the objects,are not exhibited in interlanguage,whereas some language specific characteristics,such as the types of ditransitive verbs,which vary from one language to another,are neutralized in the interlanguage.
|
3
|
量词与数量结构的话语指称性分析 = Study on Classifier and the Discourse Referentiality of the Classifier Construction / Zhong Xiao-yong; Hangzhou Normal University;Zhejiang University.
// 漢語學習 = Chinese Language Learning (Hanyu Xuexi) 2015, No.3. 2015.p. 43-50. There are many different kinds of classifiers,different classifier constructions(CCs)with different kinds of classifiers differs in persistence value,which relates definitely to different kinds of classifiers,furthermore,CC with individual classfier(CCi) differ not saliently in persistence value to CC with group classifier(CCg),which relates mainly to semantic referrentiality and syntactic role,but a little to number.CCi differs saliently in persistence value to CC with part classifier(CCp),which relates mainly to animacy,number and syntactic role.CCg differs saliendy in persistence value to CCp,which relates mainly to animacy,but a little to syntactic role
|
|
|
|
|