|
Tác giả CN
| 吴义诚. | |
Nhan đề
| 语法性与语用性——汉语名词短语作有定解读的实质 / 吴义诚. | |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2018. | |
Mô tả vật lý
| p. 497-515. | |
Tóm tắt
| Under the research paradigm of New Descriptivism(see Hu 2006, 2009, 2010, 2016, 2017; Li 2008; Sui and Hu 2016, 2017 inter alia), the present paper addresses the nature of a variety of definitely interpreted NPs in Sinitic languages, with a particular focus on the issue of why there exists a gulf between traditional grammarians and contemporary linguists with regard to the grammatical status of numeral classifiers. Having carefully examined the relevant data, I contend that the analysis of equat... More | |
Tóm tắt
| 本文秉承近年来兴起的新描写主义研究范式之精神(胡建华2006, 2009, 2010, 2016, 2017;李汝亚2008;隋娜、胡建华2016, 2017等),通过对比英语中[the+N]有定短语与汉语中可作有定解读的种种名词短语(如光杆名词、光杆量词、[量+名]短语、[量+量+名]短语、[数+量+名]短语和[指+量+名]短语等),重点探讨语言学界有关量词的两极认识即"实词说"与"冠词说"的根源所在。笔者指出:(1)由于定冠词the是语法化了的有定标记,即"有定性"是其内在的语法属性,[the+N]短语无论是脱离语境还是身处句中不同位置,皆能作有定理解,本质上是"语法有定表达式";(2)汉语的光杆名词、光杆量词和[量+名]结构等脱离语境时与"有定性"没有任何关系,既不能作有定解读也不能作无定解读,而在一定的语用条件下既可作有定解读又可作无定解读,因此它们作有定解读时本质上是"语用有定表达式";(3)论元位置上的各种名词短语可统一分析为DP,无需移位能够占据D位置的是定冠词、指示词、量化词(如"所有""每")等,而其他成分如光杆名词、光杆量词或重叠量词等,则需要进行中心语移位后才能占... More | |
Đề mục chủ đề
| 有定性 | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| Classifier. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 量词. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 名词. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| Definiteness. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| Grammatical property. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| Pragmatic phenomenon. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 语法属性. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 语用现象. | |
Nguồn trích
| 当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics.- 2018/4 - Volume 20 |
| |
000
| 00000nab#a2200000ui#4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 54006 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 306C8D02-57DC-4E7B-B9E4-5BC892B6AD54 |
|---|
| 005 | 202007101047 |
|---|
| 008 | 081223s2018 vm| vie |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 039 | |a20200710104749|bhuongnt|c20181225141443|dthuvt|y20181225141417|zthuvt |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |achi |
|---|
| 044 | |ach |
|---|
| 100 | 0 |a吴义诚. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|a语法性与语用性——汉语名词短语作有定解读的实质 / |c吴义诚. |
|---|
| 260 | |c2018. |
|---|
| 300 | 10|ap. 497-515. |
|---|
| 520 | |aUnder the research paradigm of New Descriptivism(see Hu 2006, 2009, 2010, 2016, 2017; Li 2008; Sui and Hu 2016, 2017 inter alia), the present paper addresses the nature of a variety of definitely interpreted NPs in Sinitic languages, with a particular focus on the issue of why there exists a gulf between traditional grammarians and contemporary linguists with regard to the grammatical status of numeral classifiers. Having carefully examined the relevant data, I contend that the analysis of equat... More |
|---|
| 520 | |a本文秉承近年来兴起的新描写主义研究范式之精神(胡建华2006, 2009, 2010, 2016, 2017;李汝亚2008;隋娜、胡建华2016, 2017等),通过对比英语中[the+N]有定短语与汉语中可作有定解读的种种名词短语(如光杆名词、光杆量词、[量+名]短语、[量+量+名]短语、[数+量+名]短语和[指+量+名]短语等),重点探讨语言学界有关量词的两极认识即"实词说"与"冠词说"的根源所在。笔者指出:(1)由于定冠词the是语法化了的有定标记,即"有定性"是其内在的语法属性,[the+N]短语无论是脱离语境还是身处句中不同位置,皆能作有定理解,本质上是"语法有定表达式";(2)汉语的光杆名词、光杆量词和[量+名]结构等脱离语境时与"有定性"没有任何关系,既不能作有定解读也不能作无定解读,而在一定的语用条件下既可作有定解读又可作无定解读,因此它们作有定解读时本质上是"语用有定表达式";(3)论元位置上的各种名词短语可统一分析为DP,无需移位能够占据D位置的是定冠词、指示词、量化词(如"所有""每")等,而其他成分如光杆名词、光杆量词或重叠量词等,则需要进行中心语移位后才能占... More |
|---|
| 650 | 0 |a有定性 |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aClassifier. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a量词. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a名词. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aDefiniteness. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aGrammatical property. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aPragmatic phenomenon. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a语法属性. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a语用现象. |
|---|
| 773 | 0 |t当代语言学 = Contemporary Linguistics.|g2018/4 - Volume 20 |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|