Thư Viện Đại học Hà Nội

TRA CỨU

Bài trích
Chữ Nôm and the Taming of the South: A Bilingual Defense for Vernacular Writing in the "Chỉ Nam Ngọc Âm Giải Nghῖa"./

Tác giả CN	Phan, John.
Nhan đề	Chữ Nôm and the Taming of the South: A Bilingual Defense for Vernacular Writing in the "Chỉ Nam Ngọc Âm Giải Nghῖa"./John Phan.
Thông tin xuất bản	2013
Mô tả vật lý	p. 1-33.
Tóm tắt	The early modern Sino-Vietnamese dictionary known as the Chỉ Nam Ngọc Âm Giải Nghĩa contains two prefaces: one written in Literary Sinitic, using Sinitic characters, and one written in Vietnamese, using the “vernacular” script called Chữ Nôm. If read separately, each preface makes independent arguments in favor of “semantosyllabic” graphemes (characters that encode information for both meaning and pronunciation). However, when read as a single, continuous text, the prefaces combine to present a defense of Chữ Nôm—not as a vernacular alternative to Sinitic characters—but as a legitimate augmentation of the intellectual technology they represent, and thus capable of “taming” southern culture and intellectuality into literate civilization .
Đề mục chủ đề	Việt Nam học--Chữ Nôm--TVĐHHN.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát	Chữ Nôm.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát	Nghiên cứu Việt Nam.
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát	"Chỉ nam Ngọc âm giải nghĩa".
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát	Sino-Vietnamese dictionary.
Nguồn trích	Journal of Vietnamese Studies- 2013, Vol. 8, No. 1


000	00000nab a2200000 a 4500
001	31190
002	2
004	41466
008	140520s2013 enk a 000 0 eng d
009	1 0
022	\|a1559372X
039	\|y20140520093155\|zhaont
041	0 \|aeng
044	\|aenk
100	1 \|aPhan, John.
245	10\|aChữ Nôm and the Taming of the South: A Bilingual Defense for Vernacular Writing in the "Chỉ Nam Ngọc Âm Giải Nghῖa"./\|cJohn Phan.
260	\|c2013
300	\|ap. 1-33.
362	0 \|aVol. 8, No. 1 (Feb. 2013)
520	\|aThe early modern Sino-Vietnamese dictionary known as the Chỉ Nam Ngọc Âm Giải Nghĩa contains two prefaces: one written in Literary Sinitic, using Sinitic characters, and one written in Vietnamese, using the “vernacular” script called Chữ Nôm. If read separately, each preface makes independent arguments in favor of “semantosyllabic” graphemes (characters that encode information for both meaning and pronunciation). However, when read as a single, continuous text, the prefaces combine to present a defense of Chữ Nôm—not as a vernacular alternative to Sinitic characters—but as a legitimate augmentation of the intellectual technology they represent, and thus capable of “taming” southern culture and intellectuality into literate civilization .
650	17\|aViệt Nam học\|xChữ Nôm\|2TVĐHHN.
653	0 \|aChữ Nôm.
653	0 \|aNghiên cứu Việt Nam.
653	0 \|a"Chỉ nam Ngọc âm giải nghĩa".
653	0 \|aSino-Vietnamese dictionary.
773	\|tJournal of Vietnamese Studies\|g2013, Vol. 8, No. 1
890	\|a0\|b0\|c0\|d0

ZALO