|
Tác giả CN
| Xu, Shenghuan. | |
Nhan đề
| 因果蕴涵与婉曲话语的生成 :Causal implication and the generating of tactful speech /徐盛桓. | |
Thông tin xuất bản
| 2015. | |
Mô tả vật lý
| 323-332+479 p. | |
Tóm tắt
| The events and affairs described in the so-called ‘Tactful Speech’(TS)(euphemism)are in most cases neither true,nor realistic,with them being somewhat prettified,whitewashed,in order to avoid anything awkward,so as to reduce the receivers’antipathy and achieve mild and roundabout effects.This being the case,there must be differences between the description given in the TS and the naked truth of the events and affairs actually alleged by the TS.With this in mind,how should we argue for the rationality of TS,or to put in other words,what should we do to face the veritism of TS?In this regard,our line of thinking is this:Firstly,to seek for a way in philosophical works to understand how TS is truth-linked with the reality,and secondly,to analyze the generation of TS from its original expression by causal implication so as to know more about its veritism. | |
Tóm tắt
| 婉曲话语所陈述的有关事态有些不是现实的,有些是不真实的或不完全真实的,有些是不直接地明说而要拐个弯暗示地说,有美化、粉饰、回避成分,以求减少听话者的反感或刺激以达到委婉的目的,因而令婉曲话语的表述同实际想要指称的事物在质或量上有所出入。那么应该如何为婉曲话语这方面的"非真"的合理性做出辩护,或者说如何从求真的视角来审视婉曲话语?对此我们的思路是:在哲学文献中梳理出比较合理的"真"之观点来认识婉曲话语是如何与"真"相关联的;同时分析婉曲话语的生成过程,看这个过程是如何从原用语同其婉曲话语的因果蕴涵关系中求其真的。. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| Euphemism. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 因果蕴涵. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 婉曲话语. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 求真视域. | |
Thuật ngữ không kiểm soát
| 生成. | |
Nguồn trích
| Foreign language teaching and research.- 2015, Vol. 47, No.3. | |
Nguồn trích
| 外语教学与研究- 2015, 第47卷.第1期 |
| |
000
| 00000nab a2200000 a 4500 |
|---|
| 001 | 34949 |
|---|
| 002 | 2 |
|---|
| 004 | 45390 |
|---|
| 008 | 150929s2015 ch| chi |
|---|
| 009 | 1 0 |
|---|
| 022 | |a10000429 |
|---|
| 039 | |y20150929151051|zngant |
|---|
| 041 | 0 |achi |
|---|
| 044 | |ach |
|---|
| 100 | 0 |aXu, Shenghuan. |
|---|
| 245 | 10|a因果蕴涵与婉曲话语的生成 :|bCausal implication and the generating of tactful speech /|c徐盛桓. |
|---|
| 260 | |c2015. |
|---|
| 300 | |a323-332+479 p. |
|---|
| 362 | 0 |aVol. 47, No. 3 (March. 2015) |
|---|
| 520 | |aThe events and affairs described in the so-called ‘Tactful Speech’(TS)(euphemism)are in most cases neither true,nor realistic,with them being somewhat prettified,whitewashed,in order to avoid anything awkward,so as to reduce the receivers’antipathy and achieve mild and roundabout effects.This being the case,there must be differences between the description given in the TS and the naked truth of the events and affairs actually alleged by the TS.With this in mind,how should we argue for the rationality of TS,or to put in other words,what should we do to face the veritism of TS?In this regard,our line of thinking is this:Firstly,to seek for a way in philosophical works to understand how TS is truth-linked with the reality,and secondly,to analyze the generation of TS from its original expression by causal implication so as to know more about its veritism. |
|---|
| 520 | |a婉曲话语所陈述的有关事态有些不是现实的,有些是不真实的或不完全真实的,有些是不直接地明说而要拐个弯暗示地说,有美化、粉饰、回避成分,以求减少听话者的反感或刺激以达到委婉的目的,因而令婉曲话语的表述同实际想要指称的事物在质或量上有所出入。那么应该如何为婉曲话语这方面的"非真"的合理性做出辩护,或者说如何从求真的视角来审视婉曲话语?对此我们的思路是:在哲学文献中梳理出比较合理的"真"之观点来认识婉曲话语是如何与"真"相关联的;同时分析婉曲话语的生成过程,看这个过程是如何从原用语同其婉曲话语的因果蕴涵关系中求其真的。. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |aEuphemism. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a因果蕴涵. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a婉曲话语. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a求真视域. |
|---|
| 653 | 0 |a生成. |
|---|
| 773 | |tForeign language teaching and research.|g2015, Vol. 47, No.3. |
|---|
| 773 | |t外语教学与研究|g2015, 第47卷.第1期 |
|---|
| 890 | |a0|b0|c0|d0 |
|---|
| |
Không có liên kết tài liệu số nào
|
|
|
|